User talk:Lumpsucker
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Lumpsucker, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis bergi has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 22:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis jordani has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)fishbase.se
[edit]Hey Lumpsunker, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for all the fish articles! However, it a bunch of them are referenced only to fishbase.se, which looks like a user-generated source. As a general rule, those aren't the best citations for Wikipedia articles. Are there better sources for you to cite? Rusalkii (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hey! I don't know if you noticed my reply about Fishbase on my talk page, but I just wanted to let you know that the new articles with two sources each are great. Rusalkii (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
I did notice that. I've been working on trying to find more information on some of the species although a lot of them are very obscure and primarily referenced in old print publications that I do not have access to. Fishbase is often the only source I can find on some of these obscure fish (other than websites that essentially just confirm the fish exists), but even then it typically has only minimal information which is why anyone with access to additional documents should definitely add their findings to the appropriate page. Lumpsucker (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis lindbergi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
–Novem Linguae (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis inarmatus has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
–Novem Linguae (talk) 06:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis brashnikowi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
–Novem Linguae (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis popovi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KylieTastic (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyclopteropsis mcalpini has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KylieTastic (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumicrotremus andriashevi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 04:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumicrotremus asperrimus has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumicrotremus spinosus has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Gpkp [u • t • c] 06:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Eumicrotremus awae has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Rusalkii (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Hi Lumpsucker, thank you for creating the above article. Could you please check reference 2 as it appears to point to the wrong species Microancathus fedorovi JW 1961 Talk 23:23, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
No, this is deliberate. The article mentions how FishBase does not recognize the species and instead places the only recognized member of its genus in a different one. Lumpsucker (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker
Thank you for creating Echinophryne crassispina.
User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work! Very interesting fish.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
[edit]
|
Hey! I've noticed all of your articles about fish on the new pages feed, and I'd like to thank you! They're pretty much all very good and it's quite a refresher compared to others. Happy editing! Asparagusus (interaction) 17:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I have very little knowledge of how to use the talk page feature, but I have been enjoying this process so far. It is nice to see that somebody is in fact reading these articles, so I will accept this cup of tea. Lumpsucker (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Mass creation of stubs on catfish
[edit]Hi,
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You currently appear to be engaged in the mass creation of articles on catfish. Such mass creation can be disruptive, and if you wish to continue creating large quantities of short, similar articles on this topic (or any topic) you should first see if there is a consensus to do so, either at WP:VPR or WP:BOTN; it is possible that the community would prefer this content be provided in a different manner than in a series of small, standalone articles.
Thank you, BilledMammal (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I may not be understanding this correctly but it seems as though some of the resources you linked to concern bot-created articles. I am slightly confused as to how I am supposed to use the bot noticeboard to clarify anything related to my contributions. From what I have seen, articles for species are usually individual standalone articles and not presented as part of a larger page of some sort. I have not been notified of any direct disruption caused by this process yet and I am still confused as to why this message was posted when its links seem to involve bot-created pages. Lumpsucker (talk) 04:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Bot policies also cover bot-like editing, which would include the majority of your article creations. It's not necessarily problematic, but editors need to ensure that there is a consensus for any mass creation they are engaged in, in order to both meet the requirements of WP:MASSCREATE and to avoid causing WP:FAIT issues. BilledMammal (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hey Lumpsucker, I just wanted to provide an alternative viewpoint and say that I think you are doing great work! I believe that all species are notable, and that having stub species articles (with sources) is harmless and can actually be helpful and potentially lead to better articles down the line. I, too, have created new stub species articles in various areas. Keep up the good work! Cougroyalty (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion going on at the village pump on this topic. If you have not done so already, you can check that out to see additional context and points of view from various other users. Lumpsucker (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that, which prompted me to comment here. I don't really have much to add to the discussion in addition to what was already said, but I just wanted to lend my support. Cougroyalty (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion going on at the village pump on this topic. If you have not done so already, you can check that out to see additional context and points of view from various other users. Lumpsucker (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Short descriptions
[edit]Hi, as you're creating your articles, would you be good enough to include a short description each time, per WP:SHORTDESC? Descriptions should be short (preferably no more than 40 characters), and should avoid using technical terms such as family names. Something simple like "Species of fish" would be OK, but adding a little more detail such as "Species of catfish" would be better. Regards, MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- I can definitely do so. I am currently not sure how to so I will need to read up on that. Lumpsucker (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- More than happy to help if need be. MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Fish id
[edit]Is File:DSCN6719 (6260222699).jpg a picture of Amazonsprattus? I was hoping to get a description on the Commons page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Yes, I believe that it is. I may be wrong but it seems to be based on what I could find. Lumpsucker (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've written a "probably" kind of description at c:File:DSCN6719 (6260222699).jpg and left it in the c:Category:Unidentified Actinopterygii. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- BTW, I believe that Commons has a powerful version Wikipedia:HotCat enabled by default for everyone, so if you feel like re-categorizing images, it's pretty easy. Click on the picture to open the File: page, scroll to the bottom, and use the little buttons to search for existing categories.
+lets you add a new one, ↓ lets you see if there is a more specific sub-category available, and so forth. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- BTW, I believe that Commons has a powerful version Wikipedia:HotCat enabled by default for everyone, so if you feel like re-categorizing images, it's pretty easy. Click on the picture to open the File: page, scroll to the bottom, and use the little buttons to search for existing categories.
.jpg){kind=link}
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Abudefduf margariteus. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:28, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Hypostomus saramaccensis. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Pterygoplichthys undecimalis. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for creating the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Rineloricaria castroi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thanks for writing this article. I hope and encourage you to write more articles! Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:07, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Spatuloricaria curvispina. User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Lumpsucker. Thank you for your work on Spatuloricaria caquetae. User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good job!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Barnstar time
[edit]{{subst:The Fishy Barnstar|1=You've created a ridiculous amount of fish pages for species that get next-to-no recognition and I think that's really cool :] -> ~~~~}} Snugglyaggron (talk) 00:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)