User talk:Lumos3/Archive 11

File:Vernier.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Vernier.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lumos3 (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COI bowlesfluidics

Hi Lumos3,

you are absolutely correct, I am with Bowles FLuidics; please know I am not using Wikipedia as an advertisement, brand equity, or even mentioning the name Bowles.

I made it a point to be objective and show how fluidically controlled devices are finding their way into the consumer market. If i should water it down further, please advise and I will see what can be done, but I believe what I've written is educational.

Thanks!

Jeffrey

Bowlesfluidics (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine, I like the videos you posted. They would be better as citations to support the text, as Wikipedia discourages embedded external hyperlinks. Lumos3 (talk) 22:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herschel telescope reconstruction

Hi Lumos3. I've moved the section you added to 40-foot telescope about the reconstruction of a Herschel telescope to William_Herschel#Reconstruction_of_the_20ft_telescope. As far as I can tell from the reference, it was a reconstruction of Herschel's 20-ft telescope rather than the 40-ft one. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:11, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tudeley may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(died 1589)|Thomas]] and Mary Fane, that was at Badsell until the 1920s, and is now at [[Fulbeck]].]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Lilly

Thanks for adding a citation. Please note that the citation should have the page number on which the quote appears so that other editors can verify it. Yworo (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of public art in Hemel Hempstead may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

hertsdirect.org/services/leisculture/art/hertspubart/pubartaz/hpa83] Waterplay: Michael Rizzello]] Hertfordshire County Council, Public works of art A-Z. </ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

about Fisher z transformation

Dear Lumos3:

This is Dingfang Xiong,a master of Tianjin University,China. Would you do me a favor about a problem I have come across recently?

My problem is as follows: according to wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher_transformation

However,although I have tried a lot to search for the provement of how the standard error of z comes out, I failed at last. You have edited the page of Fisher transformation.It is very kind of you if you can offer some help.

Look forward to your feedbacks and suggestions soon.Thank you very much! My email: dfxiongtju@hotmail.com Yours faithfully, Dingfang Xiong

Sorry I cannot help. I know nothing about this subject. Lumos3 (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User account invitation

Thank you for your invitation.

I rarely visit Wikipedia with the specific intention of editing others' work; I usually start with Wikipedia when merely wanting an introduction to a topic. Thus I find little need to log in (I already have a Wikipedia username). But invariably I find some language use at Wikipedia that requires a little tweaking, and because Wikipedia is nothing if not easy to change, I proceed to fix the easy things in need of fixing without troubling to log in. Frankly, the alleged "benefit" of obscuring one's IP address with logging-in hasn't struck me as all that much of a benefit - if I'm missing some aspect of this, feel free to enlighten me.108.68.36.96 (talk) 09:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I find my watch list very useful. It keeps me up to date of edits on subjects I am interested in and thereby informs me when there have been developments on the subject. I also use it to counter the rare acts of vandalism and to identify newcomers for a welcome message. Lumos3 (talk) 17:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , I wondered where it had gone. Its very useful for quick fixes. I still use the old editor for more complex work. Lumos3 (talk) 23:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like we have a very similar style. By the way, the reference dialog, especially the way it handles citation templates, is being redesigned. I'd be happy to have someone like you offering suggestions and opinions at mw:VisualEditor/Design/Reference Dialog. (It's over at the sister project, Mediawiki.org, but you should be able to use your Wikipedia username/password to login there, if the system doesn't automatically log you in already.) To get a simple and practical system, they need views from people who are focused on article editing. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:55, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turmeric, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Lumos3 (talk) 09:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:McCann right eye.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:McCann right eye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wilson Barret.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Wilson Barret.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wilson Barret.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wilson Barret.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Apsley1.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chipperfield.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:32, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chinese State Circus London 2007.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Medical model for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Medical model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical model until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mark D Worthen PsyD 21:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mountains of Kong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wangara and Mungo Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of women in the Heritage Floor may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:40, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roof pendent may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Kailash - reurinkjan.jpg|200px|right|thumb|View of Mount Kailash , Tibet (in the right distance)) , showing both the metasedimentary roof pendant and the underlying granite rock which caused the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minsky (economic simulator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minsky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of women in the Heritage Floor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lafayette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maine (province), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Turek

The article Frank Turek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. No evidence of awards or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. None of the references is independent. The http://townhall.com/ one looks like it might be independent, until you realise that he's a blogger / columnist there too.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback needed on using special characters

Hello. Thank you for using VisualEditor! Having editors use it is the best way for the Wikimedia Foundation to develop it into the best tool it can be.

While we always welcome general feedback (please report any issues in Bugzilla in the "VisualEditor" product or drop your feedback on the central feedback page on MediaWiki.org), the developers are especially interested right now in feedback on the special character inserter. This new tool is used for inserting special characters (including symbols like ₥, IPA pronunciation symbols, mathematics symbols, and characters with diacritics). It is intended to help people whose computers do not have good character inserters. For example, many Mac users prefer to use the extensive "Special Characters..." tool present at the bottom of the Edit menu in all applications or to learn the keyboard shortcuts for characters like ñ and ü.

The current version of the special characters tool in VisualEditor is very simple and very basic. It will be getting a lot of work in the coming weeks and months. It does not contain very many character sets at this time. (The specific character sets can be customized at each Wikipedia, so that each project could have a local version with the characters it wants.) But the developers want your ideas at this early stage about ways that the overall concept could be improved. I would appreciate your input on this question, so please try out the character inserter and tell me what changes to the design would (or would not!) best work for you.

Issues you might consider:

How often do you normally use Wikipedia's character inserters?
Which character sets are useful to you? Should it include all 18 of the character sets provided in the wikitext editor's newer toolbar at the English Wikipedia, the 10 present in the older editor toolbar, or some other combination of character sets?
How many special characters would you like to see at one time?
- Should there be a "priority" or "favorites" section for the 10 or 12 characters that most editors need most often? Is it okay if you need an extra click to go beyond the limited priority set?
- How should the sections be split up? Should they be nested? Ordered?
- How should the sections be navigated? Should there be a drop-down? A nested menu?
The wikitext editor has never included many symbols and characters, like ℗ and ♀. Do you find that you need these missing characters? If the character inserter in VisualEditor includes hundreds or thousands of special characters, will it be overwhelming? How will you find the character you want? What should be done for users without enough space to display more than a few dozen characters?
Should the character inserter be statically available until dismissed? Should it hover near the mouse? Should it go away on every selection or 10 seconds after a selection with no subsequent ones?
Some people believe that the toolbar already has too many options—how would you simplify it?

The developers are open to any thoughts on how the special character inserter can best be developed, even if this requires significant changes. Please leave your views on the central feedback page, or, if you'd prefer, you can contact me directly on my talk page. It would be really helpful if you can tell me how frequently you need to use special characters in your typical editing and what languages or other special characters are important to you.

Thank you again for your work with VisualEditor and for any feedback you can provide. I really do appreciate it.

P.S. You might be interested in the current ideas about improving citations, too. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Wilkes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| death_place = [[Rouen]], France]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Hey Lumos3, Thanks for the welcome, those links are great, Be Bold especially. Smoothintellect (talk) 10:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Casimir Funk.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Casimir Funk.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verification, Tone & General Notability: The Probert-Price Collection

Hi Lumos3. Thank you for you welcome note. I currently have a note on the page questioning verification, tone and general notability. I'm the great niece and goddaughter referenced in the material and can confirm that the contents is correct, or is it that you may need something more "independent". I have read the notes and references provided, but if you could please provide advice that would be great. Many thanks SilvaJay (talk) 23:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Probert-Price Collection

Also, is it possible to tweak the article now and change the url from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probert-Price_Collection to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renee_Probert-Price ??? Is there a place where we can work on this before it goes live, or save without publishing live? SilvaJay (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Amenophis (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amenophis (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:20, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freddiedreamers bw.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freddiedreamers bw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sweetest Thing (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(soundtrack)|soundtrack]] to the [[Larenz Tate]] film, ''[[Love Jones (film)|Love Jones]]''.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your message

Hello Lumos3, thank you for your nice welcome. Though in the past I occassionally edited an article in order to update it, in this occassion I just wanted to learn how to code appropriatly a text (e.g. repeated footnotes, quotes....), because I am currently writing an own article in German. So when you see me editing from here on during the following days, it will probably be for that purpose.

Once more, thank you for your feedback! Bleyfusz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleyfusz (talk • contribs) 11:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katherine Chronis

The article Katherine Chronis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:46, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katherine Chronis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Chronis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Chronis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ben Homer

added a link pointing to Les Brown

Sentimental Journey (song)

added a link pointing to Sentimental Journey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation to join WikiProject Women writers

Hello Lumos3/Archive 11! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women writers, an outreach effort which aims at improving articles about women writers on Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thank you!

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Equestrian Statue of the Duke of Wellington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington Monument. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Physorg logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Physorg logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Physorg logo.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Physorg logo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wot Cher! Knocked 'em in the Old Kent Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical score. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paddy McGinty's Goat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killaloe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015

How to pick up more women...

Hello! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. Examples include the edit-a-thon blitz during WikiWomen's History Month and the new articles work underway by WikiProject Women writers. The Wikimania talk proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that this proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you're interested in the talk (it does not signify you'll be attending the event). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]