User talk:Luke Vandelanotte

Hello, Luke Vandelanotte! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! momoricks ^{make my day} 21:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Luke, I reverted your edit to The Texas Chain Saw Massacre article because "Distant sequels" didn't seem like an appropriate section title. What does that mean? Best regards, momoricks ^{make my day} 21:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi Luke, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that the edit you made to the Karen Angle article here is considered vandalism and has been reverted. Please see the policy regarding biographies of living people. Also, other than the main Manual of Style, some WikiProjects have their own style manuals. WikiProject Professional Wrestling is one of these. Joining this WikiProject may help you get a better feel for editing Wikipedia (I was SO confused when I joined) and introduce you to other editors who want to improve professional wrestling articles.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here or on my talk page. Another option is to ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. This will get the attention of an editor from the help desk who will answer your question. Happy Thanksgiving! momoricks ^{make my day} 03:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Reso

Please do not add unsourced information or rumors without a verifiable reliable source.--WillC 00:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Lukas Vandelanotte

A tag has been placed on Lukas Vandelanotte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Alphageekpa (talk) 03:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalize pages, such as this edit to Melina Perez. Continued disruptive edits may result in your account being blocked. Thanks, momoricks ^{make my day} 04:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional Wrestling style guide

Hello, please familiarize yourself with the WikiProject Professional Wrestling style guide, particularly the Warnings section. Edits to professional wrestling-related articles that do not follow these guidelines are considered unproductive and removed. Any questions you have can be asked on the WikiProject's talk page. Thanks, momoricks (make my day) 04:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection

Administrators please Semi-Protect my user page because my friends keep vandalizing it by insulting me. Please!! --216.16.125.69 (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are talking about User:Luke Vandelanotte, I don't see any insults in the edit history. Every single edit in the edit history is either by Luke Vandelanotte himself, except for two which were done by you (User:216.16.125.69, who may well be Luke as well) and my own edit to move the page back to User:Luke Vandelanotte from the page of the nonexistent User:Talk 67. If you still need a page protected, submit your request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Distant Sequels

When I edited The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, under Sequels I put Distant Sequels becuase the sequels are between 5 to 10 years apart, seems reasonable. Why can't you make that choice? Please respond back. --Luke Vandelanotte (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please don't create fake articles (like "Lukas Vandelanotte"), they will be deleted and in the long run you risk being blocked from editing wikipedia. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burn-in

In the Phosphor burn-in article, If I play my Xbox 360 on it & if I pause it and leave it for a long time (5 hours at the most), will it Burn-in to my 20 inch Regular TV in my room? Please Respond Back!! --Luke Vandelanotte (talk) 23:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Matt Hardy, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Left 4 Dead - The Movie

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Left 4 Dead - The Movie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable unofficial film adaptation of a video game. google returns nothing that looks to be of use.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 22:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Legacy

I have reverted your edit for the second time to The Legacy page as their history section is quite lengthy and the divisions make it easier as a narrative. Also the titles help readers gain an understanding of what each section is roughly about. If you have issue with the divides, go to the Talk Page of the article and argue your case, if it makes sense it can be changed. Tony2Times (talk) 20:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zombie Massacre (film) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Zombie Massacre (film), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Massacre (film) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]