User talk:ReiPeixe

June 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Europe has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Europe was changed by Luiz187 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854146 on 2018-06-23T08:04:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:04, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Balance

Trying to be serious, mate. Maybe you are not trying to reflect the position of the parts as it is, but as you would like it to be:

The Spanish Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE), that is, the relevant Spanish statistical authority, includes Olivenza for statistical purposes in the set of municipalities of Badajoz.
The Portuguese Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), that is, the relevant Portuguese statistical authority, does not include Olivença in the set of municipalities of Évora as statement of fact. (Check yourself if I am wrong).
- Why should we do the later (through the inclusion of Olivença within the sets of municipalities of Évora as statistical statement of fact in the navigation template) irrespective of the existence of a claim?
The Spanish Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN), that is, the relevant Spanish mapping authority, does indeed include Olivenza within Spain in their maps.
The Portuguese Instituto Geográfico Português (IGP), that is, the relevant Portuguese mapping authority, does not include the territory of Olivença in the maps of Portugal. (Check yourself if I am wrong).
- Why should we do the later (through the inclusion of the irredentist map as cartographical statement of fact in the Infobox) irrespective of the existence of a claim?

That is the nature of how the relevant authorities of both parts reflect these two issues, namely:

how should Olivenza/Olivença be shown on a map
to which subset of municipalities should Olivenza/Olivença be included according to each one of the two disputing sides.

Irrespectively of the nature of the claim (which it is of course relevant and worthy of inclusion in the entry) and which is a diplomatic issue, the inclusion of such maps and templates (in a fashion not even the Portuguese relevant authorities currently reach) as decontextualized statements of fact in the Infobox and in the navigation template is WP:UNDUE.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The current maps are hardly "very biased". I don't think we agree in what "not acknowledging sovereingty of the de facto ruling autority" entails for the infobox balance and for the decontextualised use of information in a bulleted list of sorts in navigation templates. I don't recall having stated Olivença is a Portuguese district of its own (?). In any case the Olivença's ellusive subnational adscription within Portugal is not a topic of crucial relevance, because aside from other facts^{[n. 1]} the annexation by Spain of the territory predates by decades the creation of the district system in Portugal. By the way, I don't think it is even sourced in the body of the article.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ Namely 1) the obvious fact of Portugal not "administrating" the territory and 2) the fact that Portuguese districts do not mean that much these days beyond a delegation of the portuguese government with limited attributions and their role as círculos eleitorais

Ah, you entered into personal. Then, I wonder is it time for you (a single purpose account who created this account in the Wikimedia Project solely to upload a irredentist map to Commons and then include that map to promote your original research across all wikipedias as a bonafide cross-wiki pov-pusher in order to right a great wrong) to be aware of the possibility of being yourself affected by a slight personal bias? There are different approachs to a territorial dispute across Wikipedia. For example I don't see the Falklands coloured in light green in the Argentina (a country that actually entered war over the territory) entry infobox (not even it has disputed status in the infobox of the archipelago entry: Falkland Islands), nor the Tierra del Fuego Province, Argentina featuring the "islands" in the provincial map in the infobox. I don't see of what use could the email be here. As for everything else, to reflect how an institution deals with a topic we rely in published sources, not email by the staff.--Asqueladd (talk) 01:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Polytechnic Institute of Bragança moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Polytechnic Institute of Bragança

Hello, ReiPeixe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Polytechnic Institute of Bragança

Hello, ReiPeixe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polytechnic Institute of Bragança".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2023_Israel–Hamas_war. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ReiPeixe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School

Hello, ReiPeixe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School

Hello, ReiPeixe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "November 2023 attack on Usama ibn Zayd Boys' School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Welcome!

Hi ReiPeixe! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account has extended confirmed rights (automatically granted when an account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits).

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 12:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that, per WP:ARBECR, you are limited to making straightforward edit requests only~in the topic area, nothing else. Thanks. Selfstudier (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had my account for years though. I'm not new ReiPeixe (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Guess I don't have 500 edits .-. ReiPeixe (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Namely 1) the obvious fact of Portugal not "administrating" the territory and 2) the fact that Portuguese districts do not mean that much these days beyond a delegation of the portuguese government with limited attributions and their role as círculos eleitorais

[n. 1]