User talk:LudicrousEditor

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aristotle Onassis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 05:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky chops - moved to Draft:Lucky chops

Hi LudicrousEditor, Greetings. Pls note that your creation page Lucky chops has been moved to Draft:Lucky chops page. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent reliable source for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't claim someone is Trump Jrs wife without reliable sources

I don't see sources saying Vanessa Kay is his wife. Sure, fairly similar names and ages but no sources. Doug Weller talk 21:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Hunter Biden. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly with your edit to Amy Carter. Geni is user-generated content and therefore doesn't meet the usual reliability standard. For biographies of living persons, strong sourcing is an absolute necessity. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NewEnglandYankee Is it ok to use a people search engine like Spokeo or whitepages? It's a fact that Amy and James are divorced!

Proposed deletion of Kathleen Teipner

The article Kathleen Teipner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 03:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathleen Teipner Sandoval for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Teipner Sandoval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Teipner Sandoval until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Julia Thorne. Acroterion (talk) 01:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rogerd. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Silda Wall Spitzer seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --rogerd (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your apparent refusal to communicate with other users is a secondary reason for this block. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, so you need to be willing and able to speak to other users. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucky chops

Hello, LudicrousEditor. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lucky chops, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucky chops

Hello, LudicrousEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucky chops".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 11:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]