User talk:Luckyguna96

Welcome!

Hello, Luckyguna96, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Harshana Godamanna, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harshana Godamanna

The article Harshana Godamanna has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 04:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with one of the pages you edited. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Daniel Larson (Internet personality), without adding a reliable source. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If this was a mistake, don't worry, it has been replaced. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. WJ94 (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also do not add negative or controversial information to this article without supporting it with a reliable source. I strongly recommend you read through WP:RS, WP:N, and WP:BLP before continuing to edit this page. WJ94 (talk) 12:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Daniel Larson (celebrity), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 17:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pessi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 17:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Larson (Internet personality) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Larson (Internet personality). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allen Temiz

Hello, Luckyguna96

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Allen Temiz, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi this contained two references with links too news articles? Luckyguna96 (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Temiz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Allen Temiz. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:54, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Larson (Internet personality) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Larson (Internet personality). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luckyguna96,

Do not attempt to create an article on this subject again or your activity will be seen as trolling. He is not notable by Wikipedia standards and the articles appear to be harassment. You are fortunate that you have started working on a different article that looks legit or I would have blocked you right now for vandalism.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or its policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:07, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Larson (celebrity) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Larson (celebrity) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Larson (celebrity) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ULPS (talk) 21:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lionel Pessi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lionel Pessi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Annh07 (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. BangJan1999 18:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pessi, you may be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you block me I was making valuable contributions Luckyguna96 (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luckyguna96,

What you think of as a "valuable contribution" differs from the opinion of current editors of Wikipedia. Your entire talk page is a series of warning notices from different editors. I think you broke almost every guideline we have. I think you need to get your own blog for this kind of unencyclopedic content that you see as funny. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created this page which is still up after 6 years Harshana Godamana. I also created another legitimate article but it got wrongfully deleted. I wasn’t aware of what the guidelines where but I have read them now Luckyguna96 (talk) 01:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, obviously anyone who once created an article which hasn't been deleted must be allowed to continue, no matter how unconstructive much of their other editing may be. And not knowing about the guidelines... well, if you need a guideline to tell you that it's unacceptable to post pages which have no purpose other than to ridicule or attack named people, then you are never going to understand what is acceptable and what isn't. (However, I think you did know that.) JBW (talk) 08:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Annh07 (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Luckyguna96 (talk) 18:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Allen Temiz

Hello, Luckyguna96. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Allen Temiz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luckyguna96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello it says I was blocked for Sockpuppetry however this is my only account can I please be unblocked

Decline reason:

See meat puppetry. This account is under a checkuser block, meaning there is private technical evidence to support it(that only checkusers can see). You'll have to explain why technical evidence would indicate you are associated with other accounts- regardless of the operator- if you aren't. 331dot (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Luckyguna96 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I may have used another account while I could not remember my login details for this account. This was a few years ago and I don’t believe it was used abusively. If I am unblocked I will be making constructive contributions to the encyclopaedia

Decline reason:

See below. Drmies (talk) 20:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom; this may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply". 331dot (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see Jpgordon was on the case. NinjaRobotPirate, it's been a while, but do you have any background you could offer? Drmies (talk) 15:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it wasn't "a few years ago", it was last year. And I seriously doubt this person is capable of constructive edits given their history after looking at their revision deleted edits at Dan Larson (politician). Furthermore, they're Confirmed to PumaDark (talk · contribs), who was just blocked a few days ago for disruption at Daniel Larson. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]