User talk:Lucifer Morningstar 01

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lucifer Morningstar 01! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer 19:56, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lucifer Morningstar 01. You have new messages at Talk:Peter Rabbit (TV series)#Shoes.
Message added 06:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Digimon Fusion

Please read the talk page at List of Digimon Fusion characters. It's already been complained about by the editors for being too long and containing way too much unnecessary information. The page needs to be trimmed down to only contain the main characters and their notable Digimons, as found on the official websites. Episodic characters and those from the other Digimon series who only appear a handful of times in the series should not be listed. If you want to retain the organization of the main team first, that's fine, but the cruft needs to be cut down as much as possible, and what is left has to be sourced. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring

This will be my only note about this: stop edit warring at Peter Rabbit (TV series), please. You've been at it since November and it's extraordinarily disruptive. Why haven't you bothered to open a discussion in the month-plus that you've been warring? If either of you change the character order again without first achieving consensus, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Jdogno5 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:43, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why have I been blocked as a sock puppet? Who is Jdogno5?

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What does the timing of the creation of my account have to do with Jdogno5? Or Michael Demiurgos? Or whoever? Were not there other accounts created during that time period? What is wrong with using "Punctuation" or "Grammar" for edit summaries? I do not indiscriminately remove commas. Yes I remove the double "-" for my signature to make it more streamlined. How is there an overlap? Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've reviewed the behavioral evidence of the block and I concur with Vanjagenije's findings. Please appeal any further unblock requests from your main account. Mike V • Talk 04:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my main and sole account.Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I also concur; behavioral evidence and account creation/block timings make for a strong WP:DUCK case. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lucifer Morningstar 01 (talk) 05:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lucifer Morningstar 01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]