User talk:Lucien leGrey

Welcome!

Hello, Lucien leGrey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 23:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo da Vinci

I took a look at the Myan.... (I've forgotten how to spell it) Leonardo page linked by your bot. There is a problem on that page. The English name of the "Last Supper" is given as "Least Supper". Is there any way to fix this? Amandajm (talk) 00:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinnamomum parthenoxylon

I'm not sure your bot worked right. It changed es:Alcanforero amarillo to es:Cinnamomum parthenoxylon. The external link at the bottom of both the English and Spanish pages says that Alcanforero amarillo is the common name in Spanish. Maybe the Spanish wiki needs to be updated with a redirect instead? Nessie (talk) 19:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mother Joseph

Regarding your recent edit: While fixing a " mark would indeed be a minor edit, removing the word "catholic" from "catholic missionary" is not. Minor edits are never for changes in content, and removing that would be a change in content. That being said, I don't think it's particularly important for this article, as it's already clear from the rest of the context that she was a catholic. But please try to be more careful in the future about edits marked minor. Vertigo Acid (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While 65.116.190.66 appears to have made some questionable edits, and some that were clear problems, not all of them were vandalism. Since this is a shared IP, apparently from a school, it follows that the edits are not from the same editor, and reverting them all as vandalism is not appropriate when some of the edits are constructive and in good faith.

From the vandalism policy:

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.

The addition of the word catholic was made in good-faith, and is factually accurate. Your reversion of this edit as vandalism was in error. Vertigo Acid (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sergiportero

Buenas Lucien leGrey,

soy Sergiportero de la wikipedia española. Resulta que hoy me han cambiado el ADSL a Telefónica y me he encontrado que la IP está bloqueada desde 2007 ¿?

Podías echarme una mano y ver quien puede desbloquearla? muchas gracias.

Te dejo el mensaje aquí, ya que no me permite dejar mensajes en ningún otro sitio.

Me imagino que el bloqueo sería porque esta IP en 2007 pertenecería a algun ordenador zombi de estos que mandan spam, o algo así.

Gracias. --80.58.205.50 (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Te lo mereces

I thought that you deserved something a bit extra for all of the amazing work you've done for the project.
I've nominated you for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation!

--Hispalois (talk) 05:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on English Wikipedia

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 12:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lucien leGrey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Spanish: Hola compañero Lucien leGrey, he visto mis alertas en Wikipedia en español todos los años, y me he asombrado con terror como no poder defenderme de las acusaciones de algunos bibliotecarios que me han confundido varias veces con otros usuarios, como por ejemplo con el usuario ChechuBaby; yo no sabía cómo podría defenderme de esas equivocaciones a mi persona, ya que en 7 años de Bloqueo (desde 2010), no he cometido ningún vandalismo, en ningún proyecto relacionado con Wikipedia, nunca he tenido títeres también; por eso pido misericordiosamente mi desbloqueo de mi cuenta Globalphilosophy de Wikipedia en español, ya que me rectifique en estos años y no pienso cometer los mismos errores del pasado (mis ediciones con mi única cuenta que he tenido Globalphilosophy), por favor ruego una nueva oportunidad como le dieron al usuario Nihilo después de 6 años. Muchas gracias de todo corazón por su tiempo, el mismo mensaje le mande al bibliotecario Txo. -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish: Añado más información importante en este enlace de mi inactividad, trabajo positivo del usuario Chico512. -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 15:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]