User talk:Lucas gonze

Welcome!

Hello, Lucas gonze, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 05:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now (Lucas again) editing again, still in Tor, after logging out, to test anonymous editing in Tor.

2A00:801:4F:2105:B:480B:5BD5:D9C6 (talk) 23:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing page from Tor to test non-anonymous editing from Tor.

There's nothing special about this talk page, it's just a handy sandbox.

Lucas gonze (talk) 23:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Webjay.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Webjay.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 20:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved

This issue was resolved after Polly's note was posted.

--Lucas gonze (talk) 11:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lucas Gonze, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 23:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your explanation about this page. I jumped to conclusions from seeing your username, but on further inspection, you're right: there was nothing done wrong here. I apologise for the warning template, and will remove the template on the article. Happy editing. Robofish (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timothy Caughman

The article Timothy Caughman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough for own article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. smileguy91^{talk - contribs} 04:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on proposed deletion

It is common for victims of notable crimes to have their lives documented in an article under their own name, rather than under the heading of their killing. For example the lynching victims https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Smith_(lynching_victim) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Crawford_(lynching_victim).

This stands to reason because otherwise the killer defines the person's reputation in death. This extends the violence against that person. This is particularly important with regard to victims of racist crimes because dehumanization was an important factor in the assault.

Lucas gonze (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I merged the articles to avoid duplication of information. The standard for such events/people is to have an article on the event, not the person. See WP:BIO1E and WP:VICTIM. If you disagree, you can open a discussion to move the article to a different title, but there is no need for two articles. More importantly, the article needs editing to improve the format and add more well-sourced info on the crime, victim, and perpetrator. Fences&Windows 16:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The easy part of these tasks is improving the writing. I will work on that first. After that I will see if I can make a convincing case to have the article be about the life rather than the death.

Lucas gonze (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]