User talk:LucasLovesTacos

Your draft article, Draft:The Great Bootleg

Hello, LucasLovesTacos. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Great Bootleg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The People's Republic of Brainlets (April 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Bkissin were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Bkissin (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LucasLovesTacos! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 14:39, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The People's Republic of Brainlets

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:The People's Republic of Brainlets, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Reaper Eternal (talk) 06:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LucasLovesTacos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not 100% sure why I'm blocked. It claims vandalism, but I didn't vandalize anything. LucasLovesTacos (talk) 12:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you claim you don't understand why you were blocked, we'll have to leave the block in place. We require a level of competence you are stating you do not possess. Yamla (talk) 12:31, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is illogical though. I hadn't vandalized, I made sure I was within guidelines. I just decided to give a newer level of information on my group, which got removed twice. I don't know what I did.