User talk:LucasFR.pr

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, LucasFR.pr! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Acmella oleracea, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just added some links. I hope it's ok now. Regarding another subject, I also created a new page, it is now a draft and I don't know who I can talk to to publish it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zhou_Yusen

Maybe you can point me in some direction? Thank you LucasFR.pr (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Zhou Yusen, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Patents and non-RSes like The Daily Mail and The NYPost are not reliable and should not be used. Content based on them may contain original research as a result, and should be discouraged. Please stick to reliable sources. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 01:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zhou Yusen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhou Yusen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhou Yusen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JaggedHamster (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]