User talk:Luca boscolo

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to h-index. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link I added to h-index is not spam. It links to a very good software I designed for calculating the h-index and other parameters online. It sends the results by email in a cvs format. For more info please see this link. Also I'm not advertising my personal website, Via-academy is an organisation of Italian Scientists working abroad, it has around 400 members, which includes professors and researchers working for Universities around the world, but mainly in UK. This software has been tested by the Via-academy's members and it has been using by many Italian Academics in Italy. The results of this software are under rewiew by the ANVUR, the National Agency for the Evaluation of Italian Universities.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on H-index. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Crusio (talk) 09:32, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Luca Boscolo 2011.png

Thanks for uploading File:Luca Boscolo 2011.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of H-Index Calculator

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on H-Index Calculator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MJ94 (talk) 05:58, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scholar H-Index Batch Calculator

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scholar H-Index Batch Calculator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MJ94 (talk) 06:43, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Most Cited Universities

Hello Luca boscolo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Most Cited Universities for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:47, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Most Cited Universities

Hello, Luca boscolo,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Most Cited Universities should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Cited Universities .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:23, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding Wikipedia policies

Hi Luca,

Please understand Wikipedia policies, including that Wikipedia is not the place for original thoughts or research WP:NOR. If you think you have a new improved method of ranking research or universities, then my suggestion is that you try to get this published in a peer reviewed journal. If it's then used widespread, someone else (not you!) will write the Wikipedia article. (You also need to understand you shouldn't really write about your own specific research due to conflict of interest).

I hope that helps. Barney the barney barney (talk) 12:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. You don't need to be affiliated to a university to submit papers. As a first step you would want to do a full literature search to see what other people have had ideas about, and to ensure your own ideas are novel. Maybe that will help you to develop your own ideas. Then find a suitable journal and submit it to them (see what journals similar papers were published in). For the structure of a paper see [1]. Not on Wikipedia though! Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks Luca boscolo (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Luca Boscolo 10 10 2010.png

The file File:Luca Boscolo 10 10 2010.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paola Bonfante moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Paola Bonfante, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added all the citations from reliable and independent sources, could you please have a look at it and let me know whether it is ok? Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paola Bonfante (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Meets WP:PROF but needs additional supporting references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paola Bonfante and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. I have removed the section === Personal Life === which had no citation, [where you wrote ^{[citation needed]}] and re submitted it. Please let me know whether it is ok now. Kind regards. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 08:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luca boscolo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 11:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paola Bonfante has been accepted

Paola Bonfante, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article. Could you please let me know what I would need to do to remove the warning message "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification..." on the top the article? Thanks. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 10:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errr... add references to the unreferenced sections? Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paola Bonfante, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 11:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added cites from reliable sources in every section and I removed the warning messages. I hope this is all ok, if not, please let me know where cites are needed. Thanks. Luca. Luca boscolo (talk) 12:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Gaetano Thiene has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:16, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaetano Thiene has been accepted

Gaetano Thiene, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio Ronco moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Claudio Ronco, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Claudio Ronco

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Claudio Ronco has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:16, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my first article. I wrote a similar article for another scientist and it was ok. I do not understand what is wrong with this one. Claudio Ronco is a Top Scientist in Italy, is a pioneer in his field, he wrote more than hundreds books which are currently used by students at the Universities as well as he published more than 1,700 papers. I wrote facts taken from his CV which are true. Also to prove that I added the citations. If you tell me exactly which part is wrong in your opinion, I will try to fix it, so I'm going to reinstate this page. Thanks. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Luca boscolo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Claudio Ronco, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arduino A Mangoni moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Arduino A Mangoni, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a COI section as required in this page and in the article page. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but your user page disclosure should go on your user page, User:Luca boscolo, not on this talk page. You've also ignored the requirement for paid editors to submit through WP:AFC and have done an improper WP:CUTPASTE move to repost Arduino A Mangoni while circumventing AfC. I'm also concerned that you have created Paola Bonfante and Gaetano Thiene for pay as well, but have neglected to disclose the relationship. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Thanks for your comment. I have added the COI section on my user page. Also, I have added Paola Bonfante and Gaetano Thiene. Luca boscolo (talk) 09:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill I did not know I had to go through WP:AFC. Should I recreate this page using WP:AFC? @Luca boscolo Luca boscolo (talk) 10:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an AfC template to the page, you should be set to continue work from there. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill, Many thanks for that. With regards these two tags: I believe they should be removed. Ok, I received a very small amount to put this together from a CV, but it is only the truth supported by citations from reliable and independent sources while for the other, if not, could you tell me exactly where there are peacock words? If not, I believe it should be removed. Thanks for your patience. Luca boscolo (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those are to be removed only when an uninvolved editor has read through the article and decides they are no longer needed. Do not ask for them to be removed. Frankly, if you think an article that looks like a CV is a neutral and policy-compliant submission to Wikipedia, you have no business editing here. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill I did not do copy and paste from a CV. From the CV I got an idea what his professional career. As template I got inspired by similar articles to this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Rovelli there is nothing wrong with that, right? Luca boscolo (talk) 08:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I have received money to write these articles:

Claudio Ronco
Arduino A Mangoni

Speedy deletion nomination of Claudio Ronco

Hello Luca boscolo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Claudio Ronco for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kudpung,

Thank you for your feedback. I have started a contest this deletion. Let me know your thoughts. Luca boscolo (talk) 11:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a recreation of an article that was already deleted. The problems do not concern who he is or how notable he is. The issue is your writing style. To the extent that it might even appear that you are a fan, a coworker, or student of his. Please copy-edit your style to make it less flattering. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Arduino A Mangoni

Hello, Luca boscolo,

Thank you for creating Arduino A Mangoni.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please address the tagged issues

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: Thank you for reviewing this page. Could you please let me know which are considered "peacock words"? Luca boscolo (talk) 12:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is your writing style. To the extent that it might even appear that you are a fan, a coworker, or student of his. Please copy-edit your style to make it less flattering. See WP:Peacock. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

There appear to be many issues with the articles you write. 10 other experience editors have tried to offer you advice. To avoid this, please check out the many help pages. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

You need to STOP editing all the articles that you have been paid for and instead you can submit suggestions on the article's talk page with the {{request edit}} template and a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 09:40, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paola Bonfante is another of your obviously paid articles. If you do not address the tagged issues and clean it up it cannot be moved to draft again and it will go the same way as Claudio Ronco and Claudio Ronco. In the worst case scenario an administrator might decide to restrict your editing privileges.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung I'm trying to comply, I just need to some time to go through all your feedback. Luca boscolo (talk) 11:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been doing this for 11 years. You're lucky to get any feedback at all. Most volunteers here are unlikely to help a paid editor earn his money. If you are claiming to be a professional Wikipedia editor when accepting a brief from your clients, you either know our rules or you don't, and until you do, your articles will remain promotional pieces until they are finally deleted and your editing privileges are restricted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung No, this is my first one. I think here there has been a bit of misunderstanding. I was asked by Paola Bonfanti, which I only know her by her name, to write a page in wikipedia. I agree only because she is a real italian scientist. After the page got published, she wanted to thank me with some money. That's all! And now she is spreading the word to other scientists... Luca boscolo (talk) 11:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that you've been around on Wikipedia for 11 years so you should know our rules by now. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung Well, I created the account 11 years ago, but, basically, I have never used it since I had to create the page for Paola Bonfanti. Anyway, now I started reading your roles, I'll soon comply for the next articles, it will be just a matter of time. I don't mind if you want to delete those or wait a bit so I'll comply. I see now I haven't done them as expected. I'm going to create them again in a proper way using the AFC process. Have a nice day and thanks for your advices. Luca boscolo (talk) 11:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Talk:Paola Bonfante, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong A tag were saying: who paid me was missing, but I disclosed it already on my user page as stated in the guidelines. So I removed that tag Luca boscolo (talk) 13:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Claudio Ronco has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Claudio Ronco. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong thanks, I removed the external links. Luca boscolo (talk) 13:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Claudio Ronco has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Claudio Ronco. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong I removed the external youtube link. Luca boscolo (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final paid editing warning

Luca, as a paid editor you are here only on our good graces. You are expected to fully comply with all of the instructions at WP:Paid, from the get go. No forgetting to specify who paid you on article talk pages, no forgetting to list paid articles that reviewers haven't specifically called out yet, no endlessly asking volunteer editors for help. If you are unable to meet this standard of behavior, whether due to malice or incompetence, you will lose your editing privileges. Frankly, you've already caused enough trouble to merit a block, and the only reason I haven't done so already is because the articles you've created at least all seem to be for subjects who meet our notability guidelines. You can consider this your final warning for failures to comply with paid editing guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Arduino A Mangoni has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arduino A Mangoni. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theroadislong ok, thanks. I added the refs. Luca boscolo (talk) 16:33, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arduino A Mangoni

Hello, Luca boscolo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arduino A Mangoni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Claudio Ronco

Hello, Luca boscolo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Claudio Ronco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]