User talk:LucaLindholm

Welcome!

Hello, LucaLindholm!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: World legislative comparison (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a collection of content that is better presented and summarised on the individual pages rather than trying to create a summary page that puts together several different topics. See WP:NOTDIRECTORY for more. Another way of collecting everything together is to create a category "legal comparisons between countries" or something with a better name. You could also create a nav template for the pages.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World legislative comparison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:World legislative comparison, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LucaLindholm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 09:42, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lovelace (microarchitecture) (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ada Lovelace (microarchitecture) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lovelace (microarchitecture) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:World legislative comparison

Hello, LucaLindholm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:World legislative comparison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:World legislative comparison

Hello, LucaLindholm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "World legislative comparison".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MAPP (project) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MAPP (project), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). However, Emilie van Haute, I believe, does pass WP:NSCHOLAR, you might make the article about her, and have a section on the MAPP project. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radiomania

The article Radiomania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverified and unverifiable, no such topic by the name of Radiomania matches the content of this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Möbius (Operating system) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Möbius (Operating system). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MarioGom (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MAPP (project)

Hello, LucaLindholm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MAPP (project), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Möbius (Operating system)

Hello, LucaLindholm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Möbius (Operating system), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Voyage

The article Grand Voyage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability due to no secondary sources, and has also been created too soon for there to be independent coverage. There do not seem to be other sources covering the game.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grand Voyage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grand Voyage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Voyage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Möbius (Operating system)

Hello, LucaLindholm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Möbius".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Make.org

The article Make.org has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There are no secondary sources that I can find which discuss this organization. The only sources currently present are primary with no further edits after being tagged for the error.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Sirdog (talk) 01:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Make.org

Hello LucaLindholm, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Make.org, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make.org.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|NotAGenious}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

NotAGenious (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make.org logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make.org logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Grand Voyage

Hello, LucaLindholm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grand Voyage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nathalie Pâque - ESC 1989.png

A tag has been placed on File:Nathalie Pâque - ESC 1989.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:15, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Nathalie Pâque - ESC 1989.png

Thanks for uploading File:Nathalie Pâque - ESC 1989.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sanremo festival 1983.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sanremo festival 1983.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feodorovsky Gorodok moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Feodorovsky Gorodok. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 10:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese

Oh, isn't it ready to be published? I thought that with such an interesting gallery of photos and some paragraphs, it was already ready for the main namespace.

Sincerely I don't know how to extend it, if I have to be honest: all the most important informations have already been inserted and all the others might not be interesting for an English and international audience.

A Commons Category with so many interesting photos should have at least the page in the English wikipedia.

What you think the problem is, in particular? Is there some part that should be developed more?

I thought it was ok to begin with... now I'm so confused.

Regards -- LucaLindholm (talk) 11:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

The "History" section of the article lacks citations, and it's essential to provide reliable references for all claims to enhance its credibility and align with Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines. Each factual statement, date, and significant event should be supported by authoritative sources, such as academic publications or verified news articles. By adding these references, readers can verify the information independently, strengthening the article's integrity and accuracy. Regards. Hitro talk 11:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese, so it is merely a problem of references, I see... I'll do what I can.

When It will be ready and me or someone else will click the button for review... may we contact you directly, so to review it in a faster way? Regards -- LucaLindholm (talk) 13:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]