User talk:Lsrgsrd

This is Lsrgsrd's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Mikołajczak (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lsrgsrd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for information, but I don't know what part of text need to be sourced... Lsrgsrd (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lsrgsrd: this is a WP:BLP article, so all claims should be backed up with inline citations to reliable sources. Currently, most of the sections are unreferenced by inline citations, so you should add inline citations to all unreferenced content, convert WP:External links to inline citations and remove content you cannot find a citation for. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastian Mikołajczak (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG.

If some special notability is being asserted (eg. WP:CREATIVE), then please specify which criterion is satisfied, and what evidence supports such an assertion.

There is far too much unreferenced content here, violating the WP:BLP rules as well as just basic verifiability requirements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak

Hello, Lsrgsrd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebastian Mikołajczak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]