User talk:Loyalocolypse
Not set up yet
Loyalocolypse, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Loyalocolypse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC) |
June 2018
[edit]
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:HiLo48. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Also, go read WP:AGF until your eyes bleed. Ian.thomson (talk)
- Ian.thomson, I commented on his bias opinions. Where did I attack him specifically? I assumed good faith, but his anti-American, national bias was starting to bleed through a tad too much. He was getting out of control and needed to get checked. For God's sake he goes around editing away the fact that The National Socialist German Workers' Party were Nazi's!!! I apologize but I have a hard time "Assuming good faith" of somebody who trivializes the Nazi/Socialist/Communist crimes against Humanity. Loyalocolypse (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- See, the fact that you think that Nazis, Socialists, and Communists are the same is a problem. There's a reason we have different words for those things, because any mainstream historian or political scientist will tell that they're different things. That you keep equating them, combined with your inability to grasp why your comments regarding British English on HiLo48's page were inappropriate and the sheer hissy fit you've thrown over him using British English in his own comments on a talk page, suggests you're here to push a far-right nationalist POV (if not to troll anyone who doesn't hold similar views).
- Now, I'm not saying that that's definitely the case yet (because I'd say so with a block notice), but your behavior so far is strongly suggesting that.
- Again, go read WP:AGF until your eyes bleed. Do not talk to or about HiLo48 again. Do not talk about Nazis again. End of discussion. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ian.thomson, I commented on his bias opinions. Where did I attack him specifically? I assumed good faith, but his anti-American, national bias was starting to bleed through a tad too much. He was getting out of control and needed to get checked. For God's sake he goes around editing away the fact that The National Socialist German Workers' Party were Nazi's!!! I apologize but I have a hard time "Assuming good faith" of somebody who trivializes the Nazi/Socialist/Communist crimes against Humanity. Loyalocolypse (talk) 15:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.