Hello, Loveyourfaith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact God to pray that a copy be sent down to you. Triwbe (talk) 09:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?02:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First of all the title "for the love of God..." was not meant to be a double meaning but funny that I said it anyway! Just to let you know emo and emo rock are the same thing same as punk pop and pop punk are the same thing! I think they are pop rock, power pop and alternative rock as well but obviously when it comes to genres, nobody's opinion matters apart from the administrators! I'll just keep my mouth shut!--Seán Travers (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Seán Travers[reply]
Please stop adding/changing/removing genres on album/band pages. These are decided upon by consensus, and should not be changed without discussion. Furthermore, adding Rock directs to the article about stones, the article for the genre is at "Rock music". Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You need to start using the talk page to implement your changes, you can't keep going around making genre related edits all day without first discussing. As of now ppl are having to clean up after you, please start discussing beforehand. Landon1980 (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
though I am a bit of a vandal and people dont always reply, cos it would be like feeding a troll, which is what you wikipedians call it.
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paramore, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, will you please start explaining some of your edits? As of now almost all of your edits are reverted, have you noticed this? You have got to stop making so many controversial changes regarding the musical genre of bands. What is the reason for you going around changing 'rock' band to 'rock band'? Do you not realize what that does when you do that? It is getting increasingly harder for myself and other editors to clean up after you on a daily basis, please start explaining your edits. You fail to use an edit summary, and almost never use the articles talk page. If you continue your disruptive editing patterns it is likely you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. Have a good day. Landon1980 (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A page you created, Hey panda, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Hey panda. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Hi there. I've deleted the above article, as it does not meet our notability guidelines, especially those for musicians. the fact that a band has played with another notable band does not automatically make it notable; if you look at the music guidelines, we need multiple reliable sources at the minimum, and prefer also having national tours, multiple releases on notable record labels, and others. Sorry to say, but Hey Panda doesn't meet these guidelines yet. Tony Fox(arf!)18:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Friend Like That, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jesus Loves You(song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
A tag has been placed on Jesus Loves You(song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. seicer | talk | contribs18:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I've noticed you started altering Madina Lake's genres for albums and songs again. These really don't need to be edited. They've already been decided upon, and to keep changing them just bothers the editors who have to undo your edits. If you really feel as though an edit is necessary, make a note in the discussion asking if everyone agrees. That saves a lot of headaches for the rest of us. Thanks!! Unugunu (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you make anymore unsourced genre changes you will be blocked. Please be aware of this. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ScarianCall me Pat!06:06, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have blocked you for 24 hours for refusing to heed to warnings. You have been told multiple times by many different users about making unsourced genre changes that you believe to be correct. When you return, please make sure you avoid making point of view changes. If you wish to contest this blocking, please use the {{unblock|PUT YOUR REASON FOR UNBLOCKING HERE}} template. ScarianCall me Pat!21:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How many times must you be asked? Please stop changing genres without discussion. It is extremely disruptive and rude. You do not have the final say in the genres in infoboxes, so please stop changing them. Nouse4aname (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
well
i keep saying things in my edit summary to explain
Edits such as [4][5][6] are not constructive. Edits that include refactoring other editor's comments -- even on your own talk page, can be seen as disruptive and manipulative, such as [7][8][9]. Furthermore, you are inserting in original research into discussions and edits, and are not seeking consensus for your controversial changes. Continued abuse of editing privileges will result in a possible block. seicer | talk | contribs12:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paramore, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Landon1980 (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
