User talk:Lovevoetbal

Curaçao national team page

Hi there, nice work you did on the Curaçao national team page, but is it possible to add references? It is actually a requirement on Wikipedia to cite your sources, so if you could please include references (They don't have to be in English, they can be in Dutch or Papiamento as well) then it would be much appreciated, and would also prevent other users from challenging and/or possibly deleting your work. Thank you in advance. (Subzzee (talk) 03:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Hi (Lovevoetbal (talk)

My reference: I obtained the information through a book you buy on the island of curacao The name of book is HISTORIA DI FUTBOL DI KORSOU the author name is: Valdemar Marcha for more information to the book search in google.

Fernando Casanova

The page move was undiscussed and is potentially controversial; I have reverted you. Please use WP:RM in future. Giant Snowman 18:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Club Barcelona Atlético, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cesar Rodriguez and Francisco Reyes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CRKSV Jong Colombia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Lopez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SV Vesta Stadion

The article SV Vesta Stadion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable football ground. No evidence of independent coverage in secondary sources as required by the WP:GNG. 3000 claims capacity makes it a pretty small local venue.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kaimahi (talk) 04:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Primera División de Republica Dominicana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to San Cristóbal, La Vega, La Romana and Moca

Romana FC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to La Romana and Jose Nuñez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elio Benzale Guerrero

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elio Benzale Guerrero, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean Wildy Louis

The article Jean Wildy Louis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Elio Benzale Guerrero, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean Wildy Louis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean Wildy Louis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Wildy Louis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Jean Wildy Louis. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primera División de Republica Dominicana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Plata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help in my articles for deletion please

The existence of the two people in question, and the veracity of what you've written about them is not in question here. However, Wikipedia has rules about which subjects may and may not have articles. For footballers there are two relevant guidelines in this respect. The general notability guideline, which covers all subjects, says that any subject which has received significant coverage in reliable sources may be included. In the context of athletes this means coverage going beyond the routine sports journalism that these two have received. The subject specific notability guideline on footballers says that any footballer who has played for their country's senior national team or in any of the fully professional leagues listed here may be included as well. At present, both of these article fail both guidelines. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elio Benzale Guerrero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elio Benzale Guerrero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elio Benzale Guerrero (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leones De Alma Rosa FC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Reyes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RKV FC SITHOC

Will you please stop adding these flag icons in the infobox? The nationality of those managers is of no importance whatsoever. Please see MOS:FLAG. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at S.V. Vesta. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. editing in violation of MOS:FLAG Drmies (talk) 01:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Sport Unie Brion Trappers. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lovevoetbal, I have pointed you to the relevant policy a few times already, yet you keep sticking those flags back in. This is not a sticker book, it's an encyclopedia. We have pretty clear guidelines on the use of flag icons. Not in the infobox, for instance. In those lists of players they shouldn't be used either: flag icons are reserved for truly international representation, like the Olympics or the World Cup. In addition, you keep sticking them back in in the middle of a sentence: that makes the text very difficult to read. Finally, you undid the copy edits I made as well, reinstating poor English and incorrect capitalization. Your work on articles is appreciated, but it has to be done within our guidelines, and if you can't or won't play by those rules you will most likely be blocked: your edits are, simply put, disruptive. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that may be so ("there were flags before"), but then those were also wrong. Advice: if you're being reverted, with an explanation in an edit summary and then on your talk page, don't go blindly reverting again, without any reason. And let's keep this conversation together, on this talk page. (Also, new messages on a talk page go at the bottom.). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curaçao national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San José. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sport Unie Brion Trappers, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Leandro Bacuna. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources and a Facebook image isn't really sufficient either. In any case neither link explicitly supports your claim that he was capped in 2008 and 2009 or the number of his caps. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hubertson Pauletta. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lovevoetbal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lovevoetbal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Venezuela Men's futsal players

A tag has been placed on Category:Venezuela Men's futsal players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of SV Vesta Stadion

The article SV Vesta Stadion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSTADIUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SV Vesta Stadion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SV Vesta Stadion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SV Vesta Stadion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]