User talk:Lovepreet Singh Bahadur

March 2023

Hello, I'm ThethPunjabi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Sonipat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Wikipedia is not censored or altered based on your personal sensibilities, see WP:NOTCENSORED. ThethPunjabi (talk) 00:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How was it not constructive? Someone made the title of the memorial of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur be named Banda Bahadur Bairagi which is a untrue name and disrespectful, it's false information and should be changed ji. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 17:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lovepreet Singh Bahadur 'Banda Bahadur Bairagi' is one of the many alternative names of Banda Singh Bahadur. It used in literature as well, such as on page A85 of Encyclopaedia of Indian Events & Dates (2009) by S. B. Bhattacherje. Therefore, it is a valid alt. name for the warrior. Why do you find it disrespectful? Wikipedia is not censored due to any individual sensibilities, btw. Also, please always cite a reliable source in the future whenever you make changes to an article. ThethPunjabi (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sects of Sikhism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Original research, no citations given for edit. ThethPunjabi (talk) 19:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 23

Read wp:or wp:brd and wp:editwar. If you are reverted it is down to you (per WP:ONUS) to get wp:consensus for your edits. Slatersteven (talk) 15:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why are you reverting my edits? There is nothing bad about it, it's just giving more of a description after Guru Gobind Singh Ji Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and I said human because it's misinformation to say Guru Gobind Singh Ji was our last Guru, Guru Granth Sahib Ji is our last and permanent Guru, Guru Gobind Singh Ji is our last Human Guru, not last Guru. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I am now issuing a formal warning, if you revert again with out getting consensus at the talk page I will report you. Make a case there. Slatersteven (talk) 11:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

could you at least give a reason of why you reverted my addition? It's not wrong to say Guru Gobind Singh Ji wasn't Sikh Guru, with saying they were would spreading misinformation. I also added the history after Guru Gobind Singh Ji such as Baba Banda Singh Bahadur, The Misls and Dal Khalsa. Could you please give a reason please? Even on Guru Gobind Singh Ji's page it says they were the last Human Guru. Even ThePunjabi who is a good editor on here approved the edit by sending a thanks to me, please let the edit stay up as it would be correcting misinformation. Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 15:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did in both summaries. This is not the only change you made, and I am unsure how to approach a religious claim. Thus greater input is needed, hence why you need to get consensus on the article talk page. Slatersteven (talk) 12:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to read wp:rs and wp:v. Slatersteven (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Sirhind. Wikipedia is not the place to comment on human rights violations. WhichUser AmI 20:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I really wasn't though, I was editing a section involving killings of Muslims and I just said it wasn't true as many Muslims loved Banda Singh Ji and even joined their army, if it's because I didn't cite a source then ok but I shall not just not do anything when I see slander. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Akal Sena, Guru Gobind Singh and Khalsa Fauj. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - 18:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC) Arjayay (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:33, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English capitalization

The word "of" is never capitalized if part of a title. For example: battle of Delhi would be spelt as 'Battle of Delhi' as a title and never as 'Battle Of Delhi'. ThethPunjabi (talk) 07:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is true, its a bad habit of mine of capitalize of, sometimes I don't and a lot of times I do, I will try to work on it and not capitalize. Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

to capitalize of Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 08:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(thank you for reminding me by the way, I appreciate it) Lovepreet Singh Bahadur (talk) 08:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lovepreet Singh Bahadur No worries bro, happy editing! ThethPunjabi (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List Of All Sikh Battles (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This list contains many factual errors, WP:NPOV violations, unreliable sources (e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Manakpur)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List Of All Sikh Battles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovepreet Singh Bahadur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle Of Ambala

Hello, Lovepreet Singh Bahadur. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle Of Ambala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle Of Ambala

Hello, Lovepreet Singh Bahadur. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle Of Ambala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]