Jump to content

User talk:LovelyLillith/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

{{Welcome}} - you haven't been welcomed yet but seem to be finding your way around. Have fun, and keep up the good work in citing your sources in such an exemplary fashion. Did you know that you could generate automatic templated references by entering the PMID (PubMed identifier) in Diberri's applet? JFW | T@lk 18:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Equus

I've corrected the spelling. Not sure why it wouldn't let you edit the article, but the page doesn't appear to be protected. No problem, though - Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

D&D Enthusiasts

You can only add people to this category who are cited as enthusiasts (eg Vin Diesel). Most of the other people you have added are not cited in their article text as D&D players, and need to be removed until citations can be added. Metao (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Saw

Project Logo Hello, LovelyLillith/Archive 1 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the Saw film series. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia: WikiProject Saw, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of Saw and related articles on Wikipedia.

If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! GroundZ3R0 002 02:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Phoenix

Great job on Phoenix (spacecraft)! Thank you! --BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for the welcome, I'm enjoying myself and neglecting home projects. After looking at your page, I'm guessing you discovered me when I fixed problems on one of the Doctor Who or Saw pages. :) See you around. Bento00 (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation to the Saw project. Don't let it get around, but I've never seen or know anything about the Saw or Doctor Who series. I think if I join a project, I'd want to have a greater interest and more knowledge of it. Bento00 (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson

You restored the [sic] concerning the incorrect Spanish pronoun, but "programa" is masculine and so "el" is correct. I mentioned this on the discussion page of that article, before I changed it. Am I mistaken about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.243.51 (talk) 05:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Smile!

Hello LovelyLillith, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 10° 50' 14" NET 00:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to hear it brightened you day! :) Set Sail For The Seven Seas 272° 42' 15" NET 18:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Saw

I've noticed your edits to the Saw articles for a while now. Wanted to say thank you for the copyedits. :) Mike Allen 03:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure. As I mentioned, my strength lies more in the cleanup and factfinding than the actual Saw plotlines, but every bit helps, yes? LovelyLillith (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

3O Discussion process

Hi

Can I just ask what the procedure is for the 3O discussion? I requested it at Talk:Samsung Group and you've responded but as I've not previously used this process I'm not sure what happens next. I did look on the third opinion page but I'm no clearer on the matter! --5 albert square (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Dogtooth

Thanks for contributing. I'm a little concerned about the Reception section. First of all, I don't think there's a problem with mostly positive responses since the film was mostly praised. Secondly, I was trying to organize that section in a way that separated the general/technical quotes from the personal/interpretive. Do you see it differently? Ring Cinema (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Film Invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Erik (talk | contribs) 01:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added my name to the participant list, looking forward to it! Usually I just roam around Wiki fixing whatever I see is broken, but am happy to help out. LovelyLillith (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Film

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Film! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Film}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the spotlight department.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 22:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:People self-identifying as substance abusers

Category:People self-identifying as substance abusers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kansan (talk) 21:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

:)

Princess Lirin has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!


Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

  • Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
  • Research: The most recent DR data
  • Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
  • Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
  • DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
  • Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
  • Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi LovelyLillith! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Duck Products logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Duck Products logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:People self-identifying as substance abusers

Category:People self-identifying as substance abusers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Secret account 06:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rik E. Spoor

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rik E. Spoor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Housekeeping - this AFD uses a mis-spelled article title and no templates

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Stalwart111 02:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

You started two deletion discussions, one (the one now listed for deletion) with the article title spelled incorrectly. Your other one (with the correct spelling - Ryk) remains active. Just a matter of being careful with AFD titles. No big deal. Maybe have a look at enabling WP:Twinkle. Stalwart111 02:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Fixed - your correctly-spelled discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryk E. Spoor. Cheers, Stalwart111 02:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
No problem at all! It was a simple mistake and didn't cause any major problems. Just a matter of getting rid of the other one so your correct one could keep going. The best tools (I think) are the Twinkle tools which include an awesome one-click XfD function. Thanks for the beer! Stalwart111 07:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture

  • Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in association with Beverly Willis Architecture Foundation, Women in Design, and Wikiproject Women Wikipedia Design
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in architecture and design to participate. The campaign aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that by its nature combines both. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in this field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: ?here?--Ipigott (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Manley UofM Architecture School.jpg

Hi, I have deleted file:Manley UofM Architecture School.jpg as it was not free for all kinds of uses. A suitable licese is CC-BY-SA-3.0. If the photographer is willing to release with this license then we can have the image. Under fair use, the image must not be replaceable, eg building demolished. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for participating in Women in architecture

Logo of Women in Red
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Architecture Virtual Edit-a-thon, 15–25 October 2015, sponsored by the Guggenheim Museum, and hosted by Women in Red. In addition to upgrades, we created about 170 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! --Ipigott (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: ?here?--Ipigott (talk) 10:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Grossman

Hello LovelyLillith,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Emily Grossman for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MarkYabloko 10:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

More on Emily Grossman

While I disagree with the speedy nomination as "advertising", I'd advise you to re-word the article so that the very first sentence, the "lead", tells us why she is WP:NOTABLE and worthy of a Wikipedia article. The article at present starts "Emily Grossman is a PhD in cancer research.". Well, you probaby mean "has" not "is". But the fact that she's got a doctorate in cancer research isn't anything that special. Not everyone with a PhD should be in Wikipedia. Tell us what she does, why she shoud be in the encyclopedia. Something like "E G is a British science communicator and populariser, and an advocate for encouraging women in science." With sources to support those statements. Then go on to say "Grossman has a PhD in cancer research and expertise in molecular biology and genetics." Better sources would be useful too.

There's more good stuff in your sources which could be useful to include - her stage name of Emily Sidonie (needs a cross-reference), her date of birth (1976 or 1977, as the CNJ article says she's 28 in Dec 2006 so either her 28th or 29th birthday was in that year). Plenty to go on to make it a more substantial article. And you perhaps should stress more about her writing and broadcasting, with links to support this.

For future reference:

  1. there's a useful template {{official website}}
  2. there's also the code {{subst:L|||Grossman, Emily}} which creates the DEFAULTSORT (so she files under G, not E, in A-Z listings), adds the Category:Living people, and would have added her date of birth category if you'd included it as the first parameter (eg {{subst:L|1985||Grossman, Emily}}).

Good luck in the efforts to get more women scientists into Wikipedia - but just make sure that you tell the world, in that lead sentence, why they are in the encyclopedia. Just having a PhD isn't enough. (Though it's better than a lot of biog articles which start off "Joe Bloggs was born in Dullsville, Ohio, the third son of Bill Bloggs and Nancy nee Smith"!). Happy Editing! PamD 16:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandra Witelson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parietal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for participating

Logo of Women in Red
Thank you for your participation in the Women in Science Virtual Edit-a-thon, 8 to 29 November 2015, hosted by Women in Red together with Women scientists. It was held in parallel with a meet up at the New York Academy of Sciences on 22 November. In addition to improvements, we created well over 300 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated!

Hope you will also join us for the WiR Women in Religion Virtual Edit-a-thon from 5 to 15 December.--Ipigott (talk) 11:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

  • Dates: 5 to 15 December 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in religion to participate. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: ?here?

--Rosiestep (talk) 05:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music

Women in Music
  • 10 to 31 January 2016
  • Please join us in the worldwide virtual edit-a-thon hosted by Women in Red.

--Ipigott (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Never run into you before, but ...

I worked on the article Lady Lilith. Any relation? I almost posted a copy of the painting here, but it is a pretty powerful work. Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to an online editathon on Black Women's History

Invitation

Black Women's History online edit-a-thon

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Women in Red events by removing your name from this list.)--Ipigott (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon

You are invited...

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to our April event

You are invited...

Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
a Year of Science initiative

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

"Women are everywhere"

Hi LovelyLillith. I'm an editor of the Italian Wikipedia. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks,--Kenzia (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi LovelyLillith. Thank you very much for your comment. For me it is important knowing the thoughts inspired by this project. I think I can understand your standpoint. My brother lives in the USA, and I live in Italy. I can have a perception of the difference in the way of tackling with issues as the gender gap, for exemple. In Italy, we are far behind in the way for a more balanced situation in life for women and men. We are behind in the perception of the gender gap too. There must be a peculiar effort for trying to improve the gender gap awareness. That's the reason why I'm trying to do something, in this direction. Wikipedia is a powerful tool. That's the reason why I'm trying to contribute with this project. I'm sure it has a lot of limits. As well as my editing history. But, I feel the necessity of doing something more. It's surely not enough, but It's a try. Pardon me for my english. Sincerely,--Kenzia (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, just one more thing: I have taken for granted that you live in the USA. Pardon me, if that is not the case. Maybe you write a perfect English, but you live in a different country, far more problematic than Italy on this kind of issues. Please consider what I wrote about my brother living in the USA, and me living in Italy, just as an example of two different points of view. Thank you, --Kenzia (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Shhh! Invitation to Women in Espionage

You are invited...

Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Photography

You are invited...

Women in Photography
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa... a WiR & Guggenheim collaboration

File:Monir Portrait-exh ph021.jpg
You are invited...

Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Spotlight on women entertainers!

You are invited...

Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Celebrating Pride @ Women in Red

You are invited...

LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon

Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Welcome to the Hall of Fame!

You are invited...

Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project

Please join us...

Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project
A Women in Red worldwide, online editathon - 12 July till 12 August 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Indigenous women & Polar women editathons

You are invited...

Indigenous women editathon & Polar women editathon
Hosted by Women in Red - August 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

Digital Anthropology research

Hello LovelyLillith, My name is Stephanie Barker and I am a student at the University of Colorado Boulder. I am currently enrolled in a Digital Anthropology class, which attempts to answer how the digital world affects culture and how culture affects the digital world. For my final project I am doing an ethnography on women Wikipedia users and as a member of the WikiProject Women page I was hoping I could ask you some questions about your experiences editing Wikipedia pages. 1. Have you ever been locked into an intense editing war? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 2. How did you become interested in editing Wikipedia pages and did you have any initial fears/hesitations when you started editing pages? 3. Have you ever been a victim of a mass deletion or other vandalism on Wikipedia? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 4. How would you describe your gender? 5. Is there anything else you would like to share with me about your experiences as a Wikipedia editor? Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I would like you to know that I am only sharing my research with my professor and the other students in my class. If you would like me to send you a copy of my final project, I would be more than happy to! Sincerely, Stelba90 (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Upcoming editathons: Women in Nursing & Women Labor Activists

You are invited...

Women in Nursing editathon & Women Labor Activists editathon
Hosted by Women in Red - September 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

Invitation to Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons


October 2016

Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

An invitation to November's events


November 2016

Announcing two exciting online editathons
Women in Food and Drink and Women Writers
as well as our strong support for articles on women in connection with
Wikipedia Asian Month
Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LovelyLillith. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016 at Women in Red

File:Roza Shanina.jpg


December 2016

Two new topics for our online editathons
Women in Aviation and Women in the Military
Our geographical topic of the month is
Caribbean Women
During the period of 21 Nov - 8 Dec, we are also supporting
BBC 100 Women

Women in Red

(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2017 at Women in Red


January 2017

Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February 2017 at Women in Red


February 2017

Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Thank you!

For that subsequent removal. this and its subsequent removal is rather telling. Jim1138 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: I wish I could claim credit, as I didn't do the removing, just the calling out on it - but I am trying to document the fact that he is performing vandalism on articles as well as attacking at least one editor, then clearing his page of warnings. I think I'll be keeping an eye out to notify someone blocking might be needed if things don't improve. Cheers! LovelyLillith (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
I think blocking admins go through talk page history pretty well. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 at Women in Red

Welcome to...
Women's History Month worldwide online editathon
Facilitated by Women in Red
  • March 2017
  • Featuring: "Art+Feminism" and "The Women You Have Never Met"
  • Feel free to add articles in other languages too

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April events at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's
April 2017 worldwide online editathons.
Participation is welcome in any language.



(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ----Rosiestep (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Koosh ball

Just a heads up, I have closed this AIV report primarily on the basis of this earlier edit summary. I can believe this person is upset that from their point of view, they should have got a patent but didn't. Or it's perhaps something to do with the lawsuit OddzOn Products took out when they were told Koosh balls couldn't be copyrighted. I've taken the patent owner information out entirely as I don't think it's particularly important to mention in the article, and there is the possibility he is right (per Charles Darrow and Matthew Fisher - see the ledes of both articles for why) but can't prove it, or there is the possibility he is completely wrong and just bitter about something. In any case, AGF is best. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LovelyLillith/Archive_1&oldid=1252158601"