User talk:Lovekindman

Welcome!

Hello, Lovekindman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Pbritti (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your question. I'm sorry, but I'm not sure which article you are referring to that I removed. Can you please provide more context or information so that I can better understand your request and help you out? Lovekindman (talk) 19:08, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several of your edits on multiple articles failed to cite any sources or cited unreliable sources. Additionally, please remember not to leave inaccurate edit summaries, such as "fixed typo" on edits where you did not fix a typo. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I added quotes to the Parumala Thirumeni article, but I noticed they were removed. I'm new to Wikipedia and may not be familiar with all the guidelines, but I also added a reference to the article. If there are any doubts about the reference, please feel free to change it, but please don't remove it. I would appreciate it if any issues with my contributions could be fixed instead of simply being removed." Lovekindman (talk) 07:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EduAcharya Institue moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to EduAcharya Institue. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malayalam Vayana Mithram

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malayalam Vayana Mithram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 02:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page have relevant content with in information, have two reference websites. The one website registered by google. Whatever, every human have to write articles on free wikipedia. Lovekindman (talk) 04:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In wikipedia, So many article have no reference continue the page writing with in idea, what Iam talking about reviewed pages also. Must check my article and information before deletion Lovekindman (talk) 04:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EduAcharya Institue

Hello, Lovekindman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EduAcharya Institue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EduAcharya Institue

Hello, Lovekindman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EduAcharya Institue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Eldhorajan92 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eldhorajan92. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lovekindman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its not a multiple account, using different number, different email also location is also different then kindly allow editing on wikipedia pages and delete ban on wiki Lovekindman (talk) 12:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You yourself claimed to be Eldho Rajan (Eldhorajan92). Good block. Yamla (talk) 12:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lovekindman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, Its a multiple account. In kerala, So many eldho, eldhose, basil are there in the name of Saint Baselios Yeldo, Iam Eldho Rajan Idichandi not Eldho Rajan Lovekindman (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think daring Yamla to "prove this" is a good way to get unblocked. -- asilvering (talk) 02:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You aren't very good at this. I suggest honestly is a far better plan than attempting to deceive us. --Yamla (talk) 15:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prove this, otherwise unblock me Lovekindman (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will not lift this block. Any admin who doesn't see the connection is free to contact me. I won't post it here in the hopes that if this user attempts further block evasion, it'll be this blatantly easy to catch. --Yamla (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So many eldho are in kerala, how to verify that Iam. You can search eldho rajan on fb, get so much accounts in seconds. Lovekindman (talk) 04:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iam requesting to unblock me Lovekindman (talk) 04:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]