User talk:Lovegargasya

September 2021

Hello, I'm DaxServer. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ram Mandir, Ayodhya seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — DaxServer (talk to me) 12:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As per my knowledge, I added a source which confirm the view that Ayodhya isn't a Hypothesized but real birth place of Lord Ram. I'm keeping all the views neutral and citing the source from Supreme Court verdict and I don't think anything is more accountable than the verdict from a Apex body of Law in a country. In the matter of faith it's really important to keep the views of people in the mind. And if you aren't sure about the Birth Placd of Lord Ram then how are you so sure to describe it as 'Hypothesized' neglecting the ancient texts(Ramayana by Valmiki and Ramcharitmanas by Tulsidas) and faith of millions of people. In my opinion there's nothing like more neutral and less neutral in the mentioned case, and verdict of Supreme Court of India should be respected. Lovegargasya (talk) 12:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please not that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. I advise some reading:

I think this article is the one that you are looking for: 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute — DaxServer (talk to me) 13:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just bother me to explain how the word 'Hypothesized ' makes it more neutral? Doesn't it make the whole thing more biased and agreeing to the views of those segments of people who believe that all these things are Hypothesized and never existed. You're choosing the other way and acting like a Neutral person. You can add 'it is believed to be the birthplace of Lord Ram' instead of using the word 'hypothesized' Lovegargasya (talk) 15:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask and discuss about the same on the talk page: Talk:Ram Mandir, Ayodhya — DaxServer (talk to me) 15:58, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't see how changing the article to a say somewhere is factually the birthplace of a mythological figure is pushing a certain POV, I don't think Wikipedia is for you. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 18:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to a faith, then all those things related to it are considered in that way, going by your argument then the page itself shouldn't exist at all, because it's all about mythology. Even accepting all this as mythology then why should you add 'hypothesized' word when the mythology clearly mentions Ayodhya as the Birthplace of Lord Ram. Don't contradict your own statements for the sake of your argument. Lovegargasya (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:AGF. Also, Supreme Courts do not have authority to determine the truth of matters pertaining to religion, history, archaeology, science, etc. Doug Weller talk 15:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Swastika for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, if you can provide a citation for your assertion, I'm sure a place can be found for it. Otherwise not.

If it is "one of the significant cross related to Christianity", then clearly there is a major omission at Christian cross variants since it doesn't have any record of it. So your citation will be good for your urgent update to that article.

Is there any record that predates the German Faith Movement? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:52, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lovegargasya

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Lovegargasya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:02, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]