User talk:Louve101

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Louve101! Thank you for your contributions. I am KennethSides and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

KennethSides (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic articles

Hi. I see you've been making articles about what appear to be neighbourhoods of Oakville, Ontario. It is not at all clear that these would meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. What brought me to your talk page was your edits to Palermo, Ontario. Any additional sourced information should be added to the page, but the material you removed is fully sourced and shouldn't be removed without further discussion. Considering the type of articles you've shown interest in, I suggest you contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Ontario, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Canadian communities which cover these types of articles. They can provide further guidance and another editor to help out their project would be welcome. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 03:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Halton Regional Road 4

The article Halton Regional Road 4 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely non-notable road. Article was created by a now blocked sockpuppet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oakville

Exactly how many more times are we going to have to explain to you that local neighbourhoods and county roads are only entitled to articles if you can add real reliable sources to demonstrate that they're actually notable as separate topics, before you decide to start understanding what's being said to you? Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks November

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Louve101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, first of all, I am not a sock puppet of Toronto2503. Even if I was, I've check his pages that the list have created and most of them are infomational. So I don't get why I'm blocked. Please tell me why. Louve101 (talk) 20:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CheckUser-confirmed sockpuppet of User:Toronto2503. (SPI) —DoRD (talk) 20:30, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't modify unblock requests which have already been responded to as you did here. If you wish to make another request or statement, do so below. —DoRD (talk) 02:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]