User talk:Louisianajones1978

Just doing my thing.

Louisianajones1978, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Louisianajones1978! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Your previous account

Mind disclosing your previous account? Or are you going to state that you edited as an IP first and that this is your very first account? Or that this is account is a WP:LEGITSOCK account? I mean, you're obviously not new. Any experienced editor who decides to look at your early contributions, despite your blue-linked user pages that would otherwise cause them not to suspect that you are new, can see that. You showed up out of the blue to comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 April 12 (right after me), have commented on BLP, and seemed to be trying to get WP:Autoconfirmed.

If you reply, I'd prefer that you reply here instead of on my talk page, which would split the discussion. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coming Back

Honestly, love, it’s nothing personal. I was a wiki editor back in the Wild West days of the early aughts but moved abroad for work (so didn’t have much access to many USA websites). Came back to the states after getting married this year. quarantine (or maybe a bit of boredom) inspired me to come back. Was watching The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez on Netflix and checked out the poor boy’s page. Old habits die hard so I checked out his categories and saw the one we’ve been talking about. saw it was up for discussion. Didn’t mean to ruffle any feathers, dear. Seems many things have changed since the early days, but I’m very impressed by your diligence!

"Sexual abuse of Aaron Carter" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sexual abuse of Aaron Carter. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 28#Sexual abuse of Aaron Carter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Red links

Please see WP:RED: it is inappropriate to remove red links merely because they are red. --JBL (talk) 01:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know this, thanks! Louisianajones1978 (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User-generated content

Hi, I could not accept your edit to LGBT symbols because none of the sources that you cited were reliable. Please read the guidance on user-generated content. Blogs, Tumblr, Twitter, and so on, are not reliable sources. Please find reliable independent sources for the content before adding it again. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 00:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd: Thanks for letting me know! I've found some reliable independent sources and added the content again for review. Cheers, Louisianajones1978 (talk)14:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you at least stick to what the source say?[1] Do they use that WP:NEO of yours? No. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandoBanks (talk • contribs) 10:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquote links

Can you please stop adding Wikiquote inline templates to infoboxes, where they don't belong? They should be used in the external links section of an article, not in the module of an infobox. -- Politicsfan4 (talk) 21:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear, we have guidelines for where Wikiquote inline templates can go, but no hard guidelines against them in infoboxes. There is already so little integration across the Wikipedia sister project that for you to unilaterally go to each individual page and revert the changes (rather than let the individual page watchers decide for themselves) is both an act of entitlement and stupidity. Louisianajones1978 (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jpesch95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

gnu 57 19:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jpesch95 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jpesch95. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:00, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]