User talk:Louise Riche

Welcome!

Hello, Louise Riche, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rohini (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Louise Riche/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 14:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Louise Riche, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 14:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Louise Riche, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rohini (talk) 14:58, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Deniz Kiziloz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:41, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Louise Riche! I'm Wiae. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wiae /tlk 14:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Deniz Kiziloz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Deniz Kiziloz, you may be blocked from editing. : Noyster (talk), 18:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Deniz Kiziloz. Eteethan(talk) 19:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Louise Riche/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Princess Hospitality Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Princess Hospitality Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 13:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Deniz Kiziloz, you may be blocked from editing. /wiae /tlk 13:55, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

Please work on the existing Deniz Kiziloz article. However, please do not remove the AfD template on the top of that article. (It contains the text "This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy", in case you're not sure what it looks like.) That template has to stay there for the duration of the deletion discussion. If you'd like to contest the deletion, may leave a well-reasoned comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Kiziloz. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Louise Riche/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 13:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Princess Hospitality Group. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lady Renée

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lady Renée, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for promotion of any kind. Your article included things like: "Timeless styling, beautiful furnishings and sumptuous seating... elegant and comfortable atmosphere... the ideal charter yacht... the perfect combination of performance and luxury... " That is full of "peacock words", unsupported adjectives of praise, and anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. JohnCD (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Deniz Kiziloz. /wiae /tlk 16:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kiziloz Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiziloz Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiziloz Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. /wiae /tlk 16:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion

It is clear from your editing history that your purpose at Wikipedia is to promote the Kiziloz Group, its properties and its personnel. Please understand that this violates Wikipedia policy, and may result in the loss of editing privileges if you continue. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you are connected with or paid by the Kiziloz Group, you have a WP:Conflict of interest and should read that guideline and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

Note in particular that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Deniz Kiziloz with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Waggers TALK 14:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiae. I wanted to explain why you are getting a lot of these warnings on your talk page. It is because you have been removing the box at the top of Deniz Kiziloz that reads "This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy". That box must stay at the top of the article until the deletion discussion has finished. I see you have removed the box multiple times—please do not do it again. You are welcome to continue editing the article (although before you do, you must read the comments above about conflict-of-interest editing and paid contributions without disclosure, and follow the instructions in the links if they apply to you), but do not remove that box. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 14:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Deniz Kiziloz. Jim1138 (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly removing AFD templates from articles, despite multiple warnings to stop, as you did at Deniz Kiziloz and at Kiziloz Group. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]