User talk:Lostvelt

Welcome!

Hello, Lostvelt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! I'd also like to express me personal gratitude for you realizing the vanity someone added to the page on Rabbi Shimon Shkop and reversed it. Yasher Koach!--רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 23:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leib Gurwicz

File:Rav Gurwicz.JPG

Just to thank you for uploading the beautiful new image of Rabbi Leib Gurwicz, the old one was atrocious! Chesdovi 15:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent categorization edits

Hi, Lostvelt, and welcome to Wikipedia. I found a couple of your recent edits to be slightly problematic, and I want to point out two things:

The two categories Category:Religious Zionist Rosh yeshivas and Category:Hasidic Rosh yeshivas should not have the word "rosh" capitalized, according to convention. That is why you may notice that I am requesting them for deletion and re-creating them at Category:Religious Zionist rosh yeshivas and Category:Hasidic rosh yeshivas, respectively. Yes, it's a little pedantic, but things like grammar and capitalization are important in an encyclopedia.
I noticed that in a few cases you have removed categories that were serving useful purposes. For example, you removed both Category:Lithuanian Jews and Category:Orthodox rabbis from Yosef Shlomo Kahaneman. The second category can indeed be removed, because anyone in Category:Rosh yeshivas can be assumed to be an Orthodox rabbi. However, Category:Lithuanian Jews should not have been removed, because it serves to connect the Jews of Lithuania in a single category. (In this case, since Category:Lithuanian rabbis exists, that would be an even better category.) In many other cases as well, multiple categories are appropriate.

Hatlacha rabba in your continued work on Wikipedia! --Eliyak T·C 21:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template

{{Commentators on the Jerusalem Talmud}} is a very nice template. What is missing IMHO is the name of the commentaries. Who wrote the Pnei Moshe? JFW | T@lk 21:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. I get your point. But who is more important, the commentary or the person who wrote it :-).

For multiple commentaries I would put, behind the name of the author, the names of the commentaries - seperated by a bullet or a comma if necessary. For commentaries embedded in other works I would prefix the name of the works in question with "in:".

Just an idea.

Not that I want to give you extra work or something. JFW | T@lk 21:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your idea is interesting, but it would imply that we would have seperate pages on the commentaries and seperate ones on their authors! On Wikipedia I fear these commentaries would be deleted for reasons of obscurity. But it may be worth trying. JFW | T@lk 21:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi. I understand the need for a "Hasidic rabbis" category, by why would you be removing parallel national categories such as "American rabbis", "Romanian rabbis" etc.? This is likely an oversight on your part, but its effects are disruptive. Dahn 22:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the situation you describe, with or without exceptions to the rule, is basically the same for all national categories leading to all professions. If a person was simply living in a country, he should not be in national categories - if he had the nationality of n number of countries, then I hope you will agree with me that the exact value of n should also be reflected in categories (in the few cases where the subject of an article had a large number of citizenships, the categories will be a large number themselves, since this is helpful to the reader, and since it is ultimately unavoidable - for a "non-rabbi" example, see Christian Rakovsky). The Hasidic category, for example, describes the kind of rabbi, and does not supplant the citizenship of the rabbi - if done properly, as I attempt to do it, this folds neatly into the category tree (for example, the "Romanian" part connects the articles with their Romanian context, through related categories, whereas the "Hasidic" part connects them to their particular theological school - this has an obvious purpose, and is by no means redundant, afaict. Dahn 23:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this might interest you

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Messianic Jews and Hebrew Christians --Yeshivish 06:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just wanted to add my words of welcome to you. I have noticed your work. IZAK 07:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nachman Shlomo Greenspan

Well done! A nicely put-together article. --Redaktor 22:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Rabbi Avraham Eliezer Alperstein.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rabbi Avraham Eliezer Alperstein.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings.

Hello Lostvelt: I just wanted to let you know again that I have come across and seen your work relating to rabbonim and Yiddishkeit and it looks very good. Congratulations. Sincerely, IZAK (talk) 12:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dayan Abramsky.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dayan Abramsky.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shlomo Nosson Kotler

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shlomo Nosson Kotler, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.yutorah.org/bio.cfm/80101. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rav Chaim Joseph Gottlieb of Stropkov

Lostvelt, I saw that you contributed to the article about Rav Chaim Joseph Gottlieb of Stropkov. I am a descandant of the Rav and wanted to ask you if you are too or if you have any other relationship to Stropkov or the Gottlieb family.

Thank you and Shana Tova! Felix

(you can email me at fesky22188@web.de) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fesky22188 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rabbi Chanoch Dov Padwa.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Rabbi Chanoch Dov Padwa.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rav Dovid Lifshitz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rav Dovid Lifshitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naftoli Shapiro

The article Naftoli Shapiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero sources, fails WP:V.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]