User talk:Losanno622450

July 2021

Hello, I'm Melmann. I noticed that in this edit to Novosibirsk, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melmann 21:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec cities

I noticed you added a "Country of birth, 2016" box to three articles. However, the reference you added nhs11 was not in any of them and I can't see it on Wikipedia other than those three articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 16:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Please stop adding flags to articles in tables etc. These have been removed on multiple occasions now. Per MOS:FLAG do not add flags to articles and tables. Canterbury Tail talk 14:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked several times now, to stop adding flagcruft to tables as you have in this edit. These are in violation of MOS:FLAG and continued addition could be considered disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 21:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And you're still doing it with this edit. At this point your ignoring MOS:FLAG and all messages are being disruptive. If you continue adding flags to tables in violation of the MOS, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Canterbury Tail talk 12:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I am blocking you because, despite all the warnings and comments on your page and edits, you are refusing to listen to what other editors are trying to tell you. You continually, seemingly deliberately, ignore the WP:MOS when it comes to flags even though you've been informed multiple times. And you apparent refuse to communicate. WP:Communication is required. Canterbury Tail talk 12:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

September 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McSly (talk) 16:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Since you refuse to listen to anything anyone is telling you, and you continue to make disruptive edits ignoring the Manual of style that you've been pointed to repeatedly, I have no choice but to block you due to your complete lack of communication and acknowledgement of these styles. Since you're unwilling to communicate and collaborate with others in this project, it doesn't seem you're here to participate in this manner. You cannot edit here if you refuse to listen to what others have to say to you, and if you do not communicate and refuse to follow the MOS. Canterbury Tail talk 21:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Moe szylak per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moe szylak. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]