Jump to content

User talk:LornaMCampbell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, LornaMCampbell, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Judith Good, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! shoy (reactions) 16:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Judith Good

The article Judith Good has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PROF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 16:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, LornaMCampbell! Thank you so much for taking part in the Ada Lovelace Day editathon!

Now that we've created your userpage and learned the basics, I hope that you'll stay logged in and have a go at editing some articles. If you're not feeling bold enough to write an(other) article straight away, why not try a small edit first, or adding a link? Don't worry about being perfect, Wiki is a constantly evolving entity. Fortunately there's a whole team of editors just like you who can help.

Welcome! Now have some cake...

You can't break Wikipedia, but in case you're still nervous here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Remember, if you are writing on a talk page, please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. See you soon! Lirazelf (talk) 15:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judith Good for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Good is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Good until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ℕ ℱ 22:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Medicine editathon

Hello again, LornaMCampbell!
Apologies for taking so long to get back to you after last week but am just recovering from the flu. Thank you so much for taking part in the History of Medicine editathon (your guest speaking proved a palpable applause-causing hit after all!). Just so you know, we uploaded in excess of 500 images to Wiki Commons, created 4 brand new articles on Wikipedia, and improved a further 56! For the event page, click here or to see the whole illustrated story of the event then you can click here: Storify: ILW editathon 2016
I hope that you enjoyed the day, and that we'll see you on Wiki again soon.

Now that you've hopefully learned - or refreshed - the basics of editing using Wikipedia’s Visual Editor, I hope that you'll stay logged in and edit or create more articles. I've added some booklets and some links below that you may find useful.

How universities are teaching with Wikipedia
Editing Wikipedia brochure
Instructor Basics, How to use Wikipedia as a teaching tool
Illustrating Wikipedia brochure

You can't break Wikipedia, but in case you're still nervous here are some pages that you might find helpful, especially the first one which covers the main things to remember about using Visual Editor.

The next up-and-coming Wikipedia event is this one run by Sara Thomas, Wikimedian in Residence at Museums and Galleries Scotland. Details here: Modern Scottish Women 2 - Art & Feminism

The University of Edinburgh are also looking into running an editathon for International Women’s Day on (or near) 8th March 2016 – details are still to be confirmed but will be updated on my project page here: Wikipedia:University_of_Edinburgh
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Remember, if you are writing on a talk page, please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. See you soon! Stinglehammer (talk) 00:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Something I thought might interest you...
To keep up to date about Wikimedia events happening throughout Scotland, to learn more about ScotWiki projects, or to publicise your own ScotWiki event or project, join the ScotWiki Mailing List!

Welcome

Hello, LornaMCampbell, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

LornaMCampbell, good luck, and have fun. Stinglehammer (talk) 19:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming

HotCat and CropTool

Thanks for coming along and for awesome tweeting. Hope you enjoyed today. Stinglehammer (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ethel Moir) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ethel Moir, LornaMCampbell!

Wikipedia editor Mabalu just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Lovely article, thank you for contributing it. I will add categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mabalu (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Mary Susan McIntosh) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Mary Susan McIntosh, LornaMCampbell!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article, thanks very much.

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 18:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Susan McIntosh

On 11 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Susan McIntosh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sociologist, feminist, and campaigner for lesbian and gay rights Mary Susan McIntosh was deported from the U.S. in 1960 for speaking out against the House Un-American Activities Committee? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Susan McIntosh. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Susan McIntosh), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 04:38, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxing

Dear LornaMCampbell Its great that another editor is writing about Scotland. I notice in the revision history that Tara Spires-Jones that multiple articles have been written in the same article. Do you know about sandbox, silly name, but useful. You can create a link like Bio Sandbox and it keeps it on the page until it is ready to go yo article space. I thought I mention it, as it took me a four years to find them. Cool articles ;8-) scope_creep (talk) 10:54, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red. I hope it doesn't stop you writing about Scottish women articles. scope_creep (talk) 10:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

KITTEH!

(and a very happy IWD2019 :) )

Lirazelf (talk) 11:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bi Academic Intervention

Hello, LornaMCampbell,

Thanks for creating Bi Academic Intervention! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Interesting addition to Wikipedia that may benefit from an image or visual of some kind.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 17:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT: Thanks, that article definitely needs a bit more work. I started it as part of the Wikimedia for Peace event, but hope to add more to it soon. LornaMCampbell (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FULBERT: Headings added LornaMCampbell (talk) 13:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dejan Nebrigić

Hello, LornaMCampbell,

Thanks for creating Dejan Nebrigić! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Refine the paragraphs and section structure for organizational flow

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A squirrel for you

	Starting with Wiki
	Thanks for joining us on your holiday! Stinglehammer (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LornaMCampbell

Thank you for creating Isabel Gal.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good job! Interesting article about Dr. Gal and her work. (As a side note, I am myself am a descendant of Holocaust survivors.)

@Herpetogenesis: Thanks you! I came across Dr Gal's story quite by accident and it's led me down a bit of a rabbit hole. It's amazing that her 1967 research was finally vindicated in a government review published in 2020. It's also sobering to think that this issue might never have come to light, had Gal not survived the Holocaust. LornaMCampbell (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Ailsa Maxwell What a great article! Kaybeesquared (talk) 14:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for joining us tonight!

Stinglehammer (talk) 17:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	TNX for organizing this event! Zblace (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Nalder

Hey, have you considered nominating the Jill Nalder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article at WP:DYK? I think it would be a good idea. :) Sceptre (talk) 21:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herpetogenesis: I hadn't thought of that! But I'll certainly look into it now you've mentioned it :) LornaMCampbell (talk) 19:59, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LornaMCampbell&oldid=1160067362"