Jump to content

User talk:Loriendrew/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10

User talk Archive 3: Mar 2014 – Nov 2014

Feedback tool

At Wikipedia:Help desk#Feedback tool I wrote 

#t-articlefeedbackv5-enable {display: none;}

I noticed you changed display to disable in User:Loriendrew/common.css. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

I could not paste it in using my ipad, guess I wrote it wrong. Anyway, I do not think it would do what I was requesting. Someone else told me how to disable the tool on an article a different way. I was looking to not make the tool disappear for me, but to delete the accidental activation of the tool on the page.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
View feedback, click gear/wrench-thing, and "disable feedback on this page".--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 15:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, I thought you wanted to avoid future accidental activations of the tool. You are right the code does not remove the tool. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Not only do you revert vandalism prolifically, you are fearless in applying user talk warnings and making the occasional visits to the noticeboards. You honor the contributions of other editors by protecting their hard work. Chris Troutman (talk) 06:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Karl templer

Hi - I have written to contest the speedy deletion of Karl Templer as this was not a draft. It was a final entry for a notable member of the fashion industry. If there was a problem with my references please can you replace the article so I can edit and resubmit. I have been waiting 6 weeks for someone to look at this entry - please can you explain what the problems were with it. Please can you send me the entry so I don't have to recode absolutely everything. This is the closest I can get you as a link to the page - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Freemans_land&action=edit&section=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freemans land (talk • contribs) 11:18, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

There is a way to undelete an article. Follow the instructions there, but be warned that an article that was both speedy deleted normally and speedy deleted following an wp:AfC submission will unlikely be retrieved.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

What are my other options? To start the page from scratch? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freemans land (talk • contribs) 12:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

That may be the best bet. Follow the advice given on your talk page, especially about how to make an acceptable article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

But won't this take weeks to go live - I have been waiting six weeks for this page to go live. Does it always take this long? I don't know why the page I was working on initially was deleted in the first place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freemans land (talk • contribs) 20:45, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Read the notices you were given. The administrator who deleted your original article as well as the Articles for Creation reviewer of your other article deemed it to be blatantly promotional and did not meet standards for a wikipedia article. My only role was an initial tagging of the article for review and had no actual decision in deleting either article. View the various links given to you on your talk page for advice on how to proceed and write an acceptable article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Compost black

Hi Loriendrew. I saw that you requested for speedy deletion on Compost Black, and I just wanted to say that I did not make it up, and if you want to research it you may. I actually think it should be deleted; I'm not good with professional writing. :P .oOSummerleafOo. (talk) 00:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Read the notice you were sent. You may contest the deletion by clicking on the button and leaving your opinion on the talk page. A search of the term did not bring up any results. If you can find a reference/citation of it, then you should defend it (and reference the term).--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Obama-ism AFD

Thanks for your "KEEP" vote at the Obama-ism AFD. Sadly, Wikipedia still can't shake its liberal bias. The admin closed the debate early, ignored all of our arguments and assumed that this article wasn't notable because Obamaism wasn't a few years ago. --HansBarack (talk) 11:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

  1. It is not a vote :)
  2. Do not assume that I am not a liberal. double ;)
  3. It appeared to be a valid phrase, passes wp:neo
  4. Truth and Facts trumps Opinions and Feelings

--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:50, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

I wish you were right about #4. :) --HansBarack (talk) 01:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

FunctionNotationandRules

You were lucky I saw this one :-) - if you add an already blocked user to AIV, the bot will remove it within a minute!  Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah, where/what should I do in the future?--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
A good question... I think Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents would be best for these odd ones.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I understand your point. I don't rv every redlink I come across, but if there is a large number of redlinks in an overlong or undersourced article, or if the links are so old that they appear unlikely to ever become articles in their own right, that's usually when I am likely to act. But thanks for the advice. Much appreciated. Yours, Quis separabit? 18:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

re Ninjaman5656/sandbox: WP:CSD#G2 clearly excludes pages in userspace - especially sandboxes. That's what sandboxes are for, testing. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

That article is not in userspace, it is in wikispace.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 22:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes of course it is... or rather, was. Sorry §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanking you for your work in fixing (and finding) vandalism. Reedman72 (talk) 05:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

List of Time-Banks around the World

Hi, I have left a note on the talk page of the above article which you nominated for deletion. I think the article is notable and warrants to be on Wikipedia. It consists of a list of related items of which all of them have Wikipedia articles and the editor has even gone further to add sources. Unless I am missing something I would vouch to keep the article. Nyashinski (talk) 03:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

The author copy/pasted a table about world conflicts and deaths into a List article about a completely different topic: Time banks. The reflist you fixed was correct for the table and had nothing to do with the topic. Since the author had stopped editing I tagged it with a test edit csd as well as no context since there was no description of the article.'--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 10:34, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
My bad I only looked at the body of the article. Yes I agree with you that the content was not consistent with the title and ought to have been marked as test edits.The article has been nominated for deletion again and seems the creator removed the deletion tag again. What to do? Nyashinski (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
AfD placed. Unless it can get improved a list-of-one needs to be deleted.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:56, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Ref. Easter_FilmThanks I'm new here and i would like to add some supporting links IMDB Rotten Tomatoes but i seemunable to do so thanks again --It's Easter time (talk) 12:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


Lagomorph

Easter bunny - described as originally a hare, now a rabbit. Altho I see that Lagomorphs also include Pikas, not something I was aware of from my archeological course, (probably because the small bones don t survive...:) so I ve updated it to Leporidae, the collective Latin taxon, assuming you don t object to that in an Encyclopedia? Excuse the shortness, I m fed up with editors reverting edits without trying to improve them. Happy Oestre. /=n (talk)

Declined speedy

I declined the speedy for KR (rapper) because there was just enough to assert notability to pass a speedy. However as a whole I don't see notability even after finding a few sources, so I'll likely nominate it via AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:05, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Bogota Mayor

Gustavo Petro has been reinstated as Mayor of Bogota. do your research — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.53.2.115 (talk) 21:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to change it by citing a source, otherwise known as WP:PROVEIT. The sourced news article currently listed shows an acting mayor.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 22:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
sorry i'm not very familiar with wikipedia so i'm having trouble adding the links. i will just leave it wrong like it is then
If you remove/change sourced content you need to also back up the statement with a proper citation. The BBC one is adequate, but it can be in any language.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 22:27, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


Bible Code

I did some major editing to correct the information on the Bible Code page, which you undid. I unintentionally saved the page before filling in the edit summary. The edit summary is "removed conspiracy theories and irrelevant information". Can you please undo the undo?

-- Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.68.245.97 (talk) 21:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

No chance of that happening. You significantly removed content with valid references. Feel free to discuss it on the article's talk page before undergoing such major revisions.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 22:09, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Alicia Perrone

Go ahead and delete this. I have given you my permission. I will work in sandbox prior to moving it over as an article. May want to be a bit more cordial. Common courtesy goes a long way. How you present yourself is your choice, but please consider my constructive criticism. Thank you EncounterSummary (talk) 05:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)EncounterSummary

Osha - Game of thrones

If you wouldn't mind once more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AList_of_Game_of_Thrones_characters&diff=607240771&oldid=607238999
Thanks 24.79.32.243 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Blueoceany

Sorry, i had forgotten to cite my sources. Thanks for the help. I am a relatively new user, so i am not as experienced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueoceany (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Little Boy Like Me

Hello Loriendrew, Pierre Charles L'Enfant did indeed write the series Little Boy Like Me starring protagonistLukas Pahapill.

If so show proof.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 18:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey

I am aware of making that attack page. I now know what I did was wrong and I won't do it again. Sorry about that. The Big Wah-Toir (talk) 01:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Prod Modification

Thanks for that I couldnt for the life of me think which policy it was. Never thought to try Resume. Amortias (T)(C) 17:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Do not induce incorrect information, as you did at Jay Chandrasekhar, I have reverted your edit. If you'd like to experiment with the sandbox, go ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.234.242 (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Reverting your vandalism is not introducing incorrect information. You have changed sourced content which show ages and birth dates. If those are wrong feel free, once your block has expired, to provide valid sources for your claims.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Gargamel

When I said 'the late Paul Winchell', I only mean the voice actor who voiced Gargamel, back in the day, is now no longer with us, as most websites say.18:32, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Grand Slam AF — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grand Slam AF (talk • contribs)

Things like television shows, movies, etc. are always considered in the present tense, as well as the actors/singers involved. He may be gone but the role/character is still present.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 19:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nahid Almanea

Hello Loriendrew. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nahid Almanea, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

I was basing the CSD on WP:VICTIM.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 17:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
That's a good reason to PROD the article. In order to survive CSD, a person need only be important or significant, not notable. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

New pages

Do you think you could start marking articles you've tagged for speedy as patrolled? It would mean less work for other new page patrollers. Thanks! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:41, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Info listing of Robin Hood

To whom it may concern,

Please repost the information to Wikipedia that you have edited. I think that you will discover that all academic research was once 'original'. And, as far as I am aware, the information that you have removed discusses a piece of recent academic research pertaining to a work published by Scott A La' Chance, entitled 'The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood' published under copyright by the University of Leeds in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 in the year 2014. A hard copy of this text can be located in the Brotherton Library at the University of Leeds, and has been reviewed prior to publication by leading medievalist historians, including Professor Graham Loud of the University of Leeds, Dr Emilia Jamroziack at the University of Leeds and Professor David Crouchd at the University of Hull. A full citation of this work was, I believe provided on the page, but if it was not, and if you wish to make yourself useful, you will aid me by citing the source correctly.

Thank You

Siggasonswin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siggasonswein (talk • contribs) 20:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

@Siggasonswin. It is not for you to discuss others' work on Wikipedia - that is original research. We only have your word that any of this is from a worthy source. You admit that what you added is from a hard copy of a published copyrighted text; your additions therefore are probably copyright violation. Failure to stop your disruptive additions will lead to a ban from editing. Acabashi (talk) 22:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Please note, this is not unsourced material. Please read the following for details of why this is so.

Dear All Users,

In regard to the academic paper entitled, Robin Hood, The Origins and Development of the Legend, please note that this work was initially an undergraduate dissertation research paper, and thereafter became a postgraduate Master of Arts Research thesis. The dissertation paper was acclaimed by the Faculty of Arts at the University of Leeds, and in addition to receiving a 1st Class Honors degree, was described by Professor Graham Loud of the School of History, at the University of Leeds as being 'ingenious..and in regard to the matter of identifying the origins of the legend of Robin Hood, it is at least as convincing as anything which has preceded it'. The postgraduate research paper, a 30,000 word thesis, was successfully peer reviewed by Dr Emilia Jamroziack of the School of History, Faculty of Arts at the University of Leeds, Professor Graham Loud Faculty of Arts at the University of Leeds and Professor David Crouch of the School of History, Faculty of Arts at the University of Hull, all of whom are leading medievalist historians teaching in UK institutions of Higher Education (a list of their credentials can be found online with a simple Google search).

The Research Administration Department at the University of Leeds has a hardbound copy of the original document, entitled, La' Chance, Scott A, The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood (Leeds: The University of Leeds, 2014) which has been published and copyrighted by the university in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. In due process, The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood will be transferred to the Brotherton Library at the University of Leeds, where it will be made available for all UK users via requested inter-library loan. Likewise, full citation details of this work will be made available to the public when this paper is eventually electronically listed on the University of Leeds library website.

The University of Leeds is itself a leading Russell Group University, and the Russell Group

'UK research base is highly productive and has a global reputation for excellence: with less than 1% of the world’s population, the UK earns 12% of international citations and 16% of the most cited papers. This is seen as the acid test of whether research is being taken seriously'.

So, as a result of having been both peer assessed by leading medievalist historians working for Russell Group Universities, and of having been published and copyrighted under the terms of UK law by the University of Leeds Research Administration Department, the academic paper entitled, The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood is, I would suggest, fit for reference purposes on Wikipedia.


What follows is a balanced review of that academic paper, written in the third person, picking out the key points that are of relevance to the listing that it is headed under. I have listed the article on the following page because it is deemed to be of importance to the history of the township, as one will discover if one takes the time to read the article. Moreover, a full and accurate citation has been provided to the work under the heading of La' Chance, Scott. A The Origins and Development of the Legend of Robin Hood (Leeds: The University of Leeds, 2014). In consequence, the article can in no sense be considered as being malicious, and I would therefore be very grateful if you would kindly stop removing it. However, if you have an issue with either the style of the listing or the accuracy of its content, and would care to formally discuss these issues with me in a personable manner, I would be delighted to hear from you.

Yours,

Scott A La' Chance

BA Hons History, MA by Research History — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siggasonswein (talk • contribs) 11:43, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

It is original research and a conflict of interest for you to submit your own studies. Additionally essay-like additions do not belong in the articles.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 11:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Cube 4

Hello there am movie manger Hollywood and can you please stop deteled this page


Ernie Barbarash said he will making this movie on 2016 before it was Cube zero 2004 Ernie Said he will shot this film Canada on studio lion gate in 2015 crew and new cast this movie poster is not yet until 2016.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DoomDayClockSlivers007 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

AfDs

You don't need to respond. Dougweller (talk) 20:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

My sarcasm doesn't translate well when typed.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 20:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Good Afternoon,

As a new Wikipedian, I clearly need to read more. Now that I understand the rules of the pages, I fully accept my page article being deleted. Thank you for your diligence in keeping Wiki clean! --Kobuu (talk) 17:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

edit to Raphael dab

The Max Raphael article is now for the art historian. It has an alternate use link to the actor. Eclecticology (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Whops! Sorry about that, I did not see that you where not the one who asked for help! TheMesquitobuzz 03:54, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


Response to close connection tag

Hi. I note that you have placed a tag concerning close connection with the subject matter on the page Sir Frederick Wood. There is some truth to this (the page is a distant relative) and I do invite anyone to check the content and style are consistent with all objective views - the best of these are probably the obituaries printed in national UK newspapers (referenced within the article) and the information section of the Croda International website, all of which I have no connection whatsoever. I invite anyone to do so in the next 2 weeks after which time I propose to remove this flag. 90.204.225.50 (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
I love your userboxes! They are so funny, especially the radio one! Mirror Freak 15:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

CSD question

I think Mertz Conjecture deserves removal, but I am not following your CSD rationale. How do you know that Ickathu is Mertz or knows Mertz personally?--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

He said so on the article's talk page "As far as I am aware, I am the first person to name this conjecture, so I believe that gives me naming rights.".--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 12:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I missed that. I was writing out the proof of the equivalence, when I should have been reading the talk page. Guess I can abandon the proof.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

You are right I should discuss adding those links on the talk page. I'm new on Wikipedia and I'm still learning the rules. I also have a lot to learn about editing and I'll try to do my best. I just thought that adding a link regarding the current situation of a disease worldwide, could help (and I didn't understood why it was removed in the first place as a spam, that is why I've undone the edit). But please check the content of the link before categorizing it as a SPAM or else. I'm not affiliated to the OIE, I'm not payed by them, I do not receive any advantages. I'm just someone who thinks that it would be nice to know exact numbers about a disease. The same way as I would like to nome more about other diseases. Thanks for your comprehension! Best regards!Zszabo81 (talk) 14:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Wrong decision in undoing my "cheddar" corrections.

Whoever wrote the "cheddar" wikipedia article is clearly clueless as to what Annatto is. The article is FILLED with the misconception that it is added solely as a coloring agent. And WORSE, it is referred to as an "artificial" coloring agent.

The truth is, annatto is a NATURAL spice. Its flavor is described as "sweet" and "nutty". It adds to the flavor of cheddar, enriching the flavor. This is why it is added. It makes the cheddar have a rich, nutty, sweet flavor that Americans prefer.

The fact that it has color to it is incidental. The fact that it happens to turn the cheddar orange is incidental.

The misconception that annatto is added simply to change the color of the cheese is as silly as thinking that paprika is added to chicken paprikash simply to change the color of the dish.

The person who wrote the article decided to quote 2 brits from over a hundred years ago who also were clueless as to what on earth this annatto stuff is. It is not surprising that brits from the distant past did not know anything about a spice that comes from South America. Just as many Americans today are clueless about many spices that exist in places like Africa.

IT is sad that this misunderstanding about what annatto is and why it is added to Cheddar, and other "nutty" cheeses such as red leicester, is being furthered by Wikipedia, and when someone changes it, to correct this misconception, you decided to change it back to the erroneous information.

The wikipedia "cheddar" article, as it stands, is pathetic concerning the numerous references to annatto as simply being for coloring, and WORSE as being an "artificial" coloring and thus the erroneous idea that cheese without annatto is the only "natural" cheddar.

IF you do not like the way I corrected it, which was actually well worded, then you really should correct it yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.30.40 (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your edit changed sourced material. Please read the following topics: Citing sources and Original research.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry!

Hi! I am SquidDaddy, a new Wikipedian. I just want to let you know that I am absolutely okay with the deletion of the two frankly unnecessary redirect pages I had created yesterday...I'm new to most Wikipedia concepts and had no idea what I was doing, honestly (I'm guessing you probably hear that a lot). Again, I'm very sorry! Squiddaddy (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


7-year-old mother

Hi! I'm Jade6767! I am new to Wikipedia. I am looking for seven-year-old mothers. I found one: http://sampost.com/buy-confessions-of-a-tabloid-writer/grandma-on-graduation-day#comment-907301 That article was NOT a test. I'd like it to be added to the "Age 7" section. Please? And one more thing. I couldn't find a key on the keyboard. So that's why it wasn't the best. I'm sorry about that. Jade6767 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.48.74 (talk) 03:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Blogs are not reliable sources.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

What would you call a "reliable source"? I can't find anything else about that article. Can there be an "Age 7" section in "List of youngest birth mothers"?

If you cannot find a reliable sources (<--- click that link to read about them) then it cannot be added to wikipedia. A blog post is not accurate, may be a complete fabrication/hoax, or any number of other things.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

You have a point here. It could be, excuse me, someone lying between their teeth. So that's why I couldn't find anything else on that matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.48.74 (talk) 02:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your AIV report

Bea Miller seems to be having problems with more than just the one IP; so instead of blocking the IP, I've semiprotected the article for three days. If the vandalism resumes after the protection expires, leave a note on my talk page, and I'll consider extending the protection. Deor (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

It is a pair of IPs, one of which seems to have gotten an account now, which will make identifying vandalism easier.☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 12:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, my idea is that whatever (if anything) happens after the protection expires will provide a clearer picture of what's going on. If it becomes clear that the IPs are fairly stable, rather than dynamic, and that the new account is one of them, handing out blocks all around will be more justifiable. I know it's frustrating to have on one's watchlist an article that's undergoing a spate of vandalism, but let's hope that the protection makes them give up. Deor (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Pain and Gain

Hi I had made the change to the name in the Pain and gain wiki cause i read the story which was published in 1999 and Mario Sanchez, "Big Mario," was a former Sun Gym weight-lifting instructor and licensed Florida private eye. The detective business had soured, and Sanchez, at six feet four and 270 pounds, worked as a bouncer at Hooligan's Pub & Oyster Bar in Miami Lakes also he still possessed several assets, notably, a concealed-weapon permit and a .357-Magnum revolver. thus stevenson Pierre is the 3rd character on which dwayne johnson is based on as Stevenson got 7 years in prison too. http://www.miaminewtimes.com/1999-12-23/news/pain-gain/full/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.5.0.145 (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

COI on Blebbishield emergency program article

Hi Loriendrew, The article "Blebbishield emergency program" is genuine and has no bias or any type of commercial promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodwinjinesh (talk • contribs) 01:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete my articles

Hi Loriendrew,

Please try to delete both of my articles thanks!

SamS71 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SamS71 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 10
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loriendrew/Archive_3&oldid=1139324318"