User talk:Lorenzo Fracassa

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lorenzo Fracassa! Thank you for your contributions. I'm CaptainEek and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. I am always willing to help folks out! You can also check out the friendly Teahouse to ask any questions you might have. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Algeria–Morocco relations have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 12:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ruy. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Ruy (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest

Care to explain why you keep adding a link to a self-published article that is written by a nobody? M.Bitton (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lorenzo Fracassa

A tag has been placed on User:Lorenzo Fracassa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ruy (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (error in good faith) --Lorenzo Fracassa (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,this is a good decision. Lorenzo Fracassa (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Israeli conflict

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You are not allowed to edit pages per the above notice until you have 500 edits. Also note that your recent revert introduced a source into the 2021 Jerusalem shooting article that is deprecated so has been reversed. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 23:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Selfstudier (talk) 23:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have readded material into an article you are not allowed to edit. Please stop doing this or your account is likely to get blocked from editing.Selfstudier (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36h for adding unsourced content to a PIA article after two warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lorenzo Fracassa! Your additions to 2021 Solomon Islands unrest have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits at "Anarchism in Greece", there is a discussion at Talk:Anarchism in Greece

At section "Metropolitan Catastrophes Group". Could you pls participate? Your opinion is needed. Thanks! Cinadon36 05:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lorenzo Fracassa, please discuss your proposed edit and sources in Talk:Anarchism_in_Greece#Metropolitan_Catastrophes_Group before attempting to re-add it (which is considered edit warring on Wikipedia). If you continue to ignore these messages and attempt to add it back, your edits will be reverted and your account may be blocked, similar to the incident above. We'd much rather you have a fruitful and congenial dialogue at the discussion linked above. czar 00:46, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afghanistan–Pakistan skirmishes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages TTP and Kunar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite your sources

Hi @Lorenzo Fracassa, I notice you have made a number of additions to various Wikipedia articles lately that lack any reliable sources. As such, I'm having to revert many of them as they have violated Wikipedia's policy on original research. Adding sources along with your information ensures that other Wikipedians can verify the information, which is vital to ensuring the encyclopedia remain factually accurate. If you can cite some sources for the information you are attempting to add to these articles, then feel free to add them alongside the information. But if you continue to add unsourced information, this could be taken as an example of disruptive editing and thus be grounds for blocking. I strongly encourage you to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies on these matters, so that you can better help build this encyclopedia. Regards. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]