User talk:Lord Monboddo

William Blackstone

Thanks for your edit to William Blackstone; from one legal eagle to another, welcome to Wikipedia! Let me know if you need any help :). Ironholds (talk) 07:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Terence Hallinan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lake County, Willie Brown and Young Democrats. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Rapanos v. United States

First and foremost, I want to thank you for your efforts to improve the article for Rapanos v. United States! There are many SCOTUS articles that are in desperate need of creation and expansion, and we need editors like you to help with content creation! This is especially relevant for landmark cases like Rapanos, which is considered one of the seminal CWA cases of the last two decades. However, I wanted to write to you to call your attention to a few things about writing content for SCOTUS articles.

First, it is important to write summaries of opinions in the past tense (i.e. "Justice Marshall argued" instead of "Justice Marshall argues"). The Justices are not currently in the process of announcing their opinions, and Wikipedia summaries of opinions have always been written in the past tense (see also the SCOTUS style guide for general advice about structuring SCOTUS articles).
Second, if you use the Bluebook citation method, it is important to use it correctly. I noticed, for example, you did not use a short case name for short cites, you did not use smallcaps for titles (see the {{smallcaps}} template), and you did not use explanatory parentheticals per rule 10.6.2.
Third, you should refer to Justices as "Justice Powell" or "Justice Blackmun", rather than just "Powell" or "Blackmun". See this recent discussion, in which a consensus of editors agreed we should use the honorific "Justice" before a Justice's last name.
Fourth, it is important to describe opinions as neutrally as possible so that we do not give the impression that we favor one outcome over another. Therefore, it is important to avoid phrases like "[h]e then complains ..." or "Stevens takes care ...", which carry subjective connotations about the nature and quality of a Justice's opinion.

I went ahead and edited the Rapanos article to resolve the aforementioned issues. However, I want to emphasize that I am very excited about the possibility of having another contributor to SCOTUS articles here at Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of any help, and I look forward to working with you in the future! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 00:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up my citations! I think it’s great somebody is paying attention to this. Rule 10.9(a)(i) in my outdated Bluebook permitted omitting the case name in short cites if the reader will have no doubt about the case referred to, just like an idem.

Use of the honorific is news to me. I’ll be sure to abide by the consensus from here on out.

Impartial tone is, of course, an essential part of NPOV. Still, use of emotive language is an important tool in communicating the dispute between justices to non-legal readers. You are right to remove any language that reads as tonally favoring one outcome over another. However, please do not remove emotive language simply for being emotive. Lord Monboddo (talk) 11:04, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Deferred Action for Parents of Americans

added a link pointing to Immigration and Nationality Act

Immigration reform

added a link pointing to Immigration and Nationality Act

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Texas v. United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immigration and Nationality Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concerted action. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	truth telling award
	you are the first to have added anything (constructively) to the WY DEQ page ! Wuerzele (talk) 16:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sierra Club v. Morton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Discovery and Wilderness Society. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merrick Garland

Well done, I'm impressed! Since I also edit in the legal space I've always been impressed with your legal knowledge and contributions. One quibble though: Wikipedia generally doesn't conform to Bluebook, which is more intended for a legal readership rather than a lay readership. (E.g. how many non-lawyers know what "Harv. L. Rev." stands for?) Better to use the {{cite court}} and {{cite journal}} templates, which allow for consistency across the encyclopedia. Cheers and keep up the good work. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timely article expansion

Thanks for your much needed expansion of Adult Use of Marijuana Act. - Brianhe (talk) 01:07, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the CalPERS page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lord Monboddo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your work on Patricia Head Minaldi. Bearian (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Garner facebook.jpg

You contributed to death of Eric Garner. I invite you to discuss the image at the FFD discussion. --George Ho (talk) 23:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Thaddeus Coleman Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montgomery v. Louisiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Crichton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odious debt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arbiter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Politrukki (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Jeff Sessions is under discretionary sanctions. When you edit the page, you should see this edit notice, which says that you may reinstate any challenged edits without talk page consensus. This is also mentioned on the talk page header here. Please self-revert your edits that have been challenged. If you feel that something has been improperly removed, go to the article talk page. Politrukki (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Executive Order 13780 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moot

Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lord Monboddo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garza v. Hargan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lord Monboddo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Marion Wilson (prisoner) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Supreme Court of Georgia

Wilson v. Sellers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Supreme Court of Georgia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Patricia Millett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

Robert L. Wilkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Patricia Millett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

Robert L. Wilkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Administrative Procedure Act

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question for Lord Monboddo

Dear Lord Monboddo,

I see that you upload a lot of sources from the Harvard Law Review. I was wondering if you have any affiliation with the journal. Please get in touch at kkeller@jd19.law.harvard.edu. I'd love to talk!

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:5104:D200:F9E9:7796:81C:E8FA (talk) 23:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, sorry, I have no past or present Harvard affiliations. I’ve taken a wholesale approach to the HLR because it is the last of the major law reviews that still consistently reviews legal cases. The argumentative essays on doctrine or legal theory that preoccupy most law reviews today are of very little use to an encyclopedic editor. While newspapers unfailingly cover cases involving celebrities or the culture war, it is far too hard to find openly available secondary sources commenting on jurisprudentially significant decisions of particular judges in particular cases. The HLR students' Recent Cases are, then, a needful source for anyone hoping to shine a little sunlight on the federal bench.

Users across WP:LAW unfortunately often take a very sloppy approach to WP:PSTS. Articles on individual judges or officials compound this problem, where it is not unusual to see copy of questionable accuracy or WP:NOTE included with citation to no more than the case's text itself, even on a WP:BLP. Nobody comes to Wikipedia to read a random student's own WP:OR interpreting a primary legal text they only just encountered. Editors of tertiary sources like Wikipedia must rely upon reliable secondary sources like the HLR to expound on primary legal authorities. We here can always use more capable editors ready to pay close attention to sourcing, and I would encourage you to create an account, start editing, and be bold. — Lord Monboddo (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick J. Bumatay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]