User talk:Longhair/Archive15

Image tagging for Image:Milatguns.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Milatguns.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soldier settlement (Australia)

Hi Longhair, soldier settlement schemes directly influenced every state of Australia and have a direct link to irrigation commencement etc - and which were prevalent in the Merbein, Red Cliffs, Mildura areas (amongst many others). Until today there was no article on Wiki covering the topic. I have started it and have also suggested it to be a WP:ACOTF article - would welcome your support if you think that such an article is appropriate for a collaboration project? --VS ^{talk...images} 02:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ripcurl

Abusive editor working from a number of ip numbers is coming back and even imitating warnings onto those who revert ... if youre around - maybe worth a squizz. cheers Satu Suro 22:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding - no problems - no rush - its a persistent one - maybe needs a couple of blocks on diff ips... Satu Suro 22:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Irrigation Images

Hi Longhair. I have created a page at Wikimedia Commons called Irrigation in Australia. Any photographs you may have relevant to the topic would be great additions. The commons page is linked back to the article, Irrigation in Australia.--Mattinbgn/^talk 11:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD

Hi you started Category:Double-named places in Australia but you may not be aware that it is up for deletion at Categories for discussion and / or merger in the related discussion above which also suggests renaming. I think it is a useful category. Regards --Golden Wattle ^talk 20:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australia project future

Hi Longhair. I'll be back on-wiki a bit more regularly now that I'm back home, though probably still less frequently than usual. What's the status of the banner plans? You mention the Indian option, which seems fine to me. Any reason not to implement it now?--cj | talk 09:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trodel

Hi, I wish to raise the point that Trodel has not been on often. I think I should have a more active mentor. -- Punk Boi 8 08:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

When I 'm on late at night, or trawling the other side of the planets vandalism when I wake up :0 I see the bot in action on my mates talk pages, just a bit slow on doing that myself thanks for the hint - I was highly honoured by a very cantankerous newbie in the states who considered by 30 talk page archives to be a negative - yeehah I said to myself at the time and took it as a compliment - the notion of a low interaction editor to me is a monomaniac one article editor - as i work in four different projects i cannot afford low talk... cheers Satu Suro 11:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chainsaws and Ice picks

And its still summer, gather all is kinda ok. Thanks for the look at user:X pretty well much the same conclusion to what I came to and suggested when talking to X. Expand your horizons and avoid that article. Anyhow this editor seems to gone quiet, think maybe a new name was created, oh well if X starts I'm still watching both the arts and User. Still concerned about the other side of that coin and it actions, just watching that one as well. Gnan garra 13:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Comment

Can you please just comment on my edits to the Australia Quizmaina page, I have put some hard work in to it! -- Punk Boi 8 06:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunraysia/Mallee

You just beat me to it with the edit of adding spaces (thank you:-) ). I have now added every location north of the Mallee Highway to the Sunraysia template - so my question is - do you have an idea of the definitive cut-off line south of that mark at this stage (for example would you go as far south as the Western Highway? --VS ^talk 06:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunraysia locality nominated to DYK

Just thought I'd let you know that I have posted the locality Boinka to DYK as detailed here - with the view to it gaining some interest, amongst other things, in Template:Sunraysia --VS ^talk 12:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds-Bradford

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Leeds-Bradford, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. L.J.Skinner^{WOT?|I did} 20:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Hi, Longhair. I'm on the final leg of my RfA thank you tour (with one eye on CSD and AIV, I might add!). Thanks for your support and look forward to working with you. :) Bubba hotep 21:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AUS assessment category names

Message to you here. I posted it where most relevant, but it's mostly only your opinion I'm looking for. Hesperian 02:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Mentor

Hi, I have started a vote for a new mentor and I have nominated you. Please see User:Punk Boi 8/Mentoring/New Mentor Vote for more. Good Luck. -- Punk Boi 8 09:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck indeed. Sarah 00:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I know how you feel. I just thought I should offer my wishes for good luck as it sounded like you were in the running for an excellent prize! :) Sarah 00:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems there's another explanation for it all.--cj | talk 03:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to Nathan withdrawing the basis for the dispute and the fact it was not endorsed, I've deleted the RFC.--cj | talk 03:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Karmeinchan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Karmeinchan.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ebony Simpson and articles about victims or murders rather than the murder

Hi

I am disappointed that PDH failed to notify you of an AfD despite a prompt [1]. She has nominated Ebony Simpson for deletion. There are some interesting principles being explored in the deletion debate. Regards --Golden Wattle ^talk 01:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bradley_murdoch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bradley_murdoch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:Falconio_couple203.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Falconio_couple203.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hi

Email Satu Suro 03:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Breach of NPA

Hi, another user breached WP:NPA concerning you. I've reverted the edit, however if you wish to follow this up, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angak&diff=115682086&oldid=115525785. --Sharz 00:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

For the Aust Maritime Hist project things - it is appreciated Satu Suro 10:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the troglodytes have amusing means by which they leave messages - they seem to want to live outside the box - the big prob has been after tagging west oz, tassie and indonesia for so long - I'll have to start the amh to get some arts in the system - as always thank you for your hard work - Satu Suro 10:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have had it explained to me what exactly an admin has to put up re emails alone - I never expect short term responses as a result of an axplanation of this - its just the issue of making sure the gargoyles are in the sights in a manner of speaking. thanks again Satu Suro 10:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

I'd tend to agree with the unpopulatable airport cats for the indian ocean territories - but is there a larger brush that can still catch em? Satu Suro 10:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the intention of the original idea - and I can see it cannot work except under the very large umbrella....Satu Suro 11:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have email on a question like that - thats like asking a very personal question - (you wonder - is this guy nuts?) you'll see why when you read it! Satu Suro 11:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Murdochcctvimage.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Murdochcctvimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you

Thanks for the welcome. I hope the Fort Queenscliff Article develops well. Im very new at this adn so far im impressed. Jampire1 05:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam ____

Thanks for removing those unsourced images on what is for now called Miriam Rivera. It was looking like a fan page! Jokestress 06:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Could you help me here, the article is sourced from "A soldiers five minutes on the fort: A concise history of Fort Queenscliff" Which is written and published by the Museum. No Author is credited, and no official history of the fort exists. Additional points come from the published brochure of the museum. How is it best to credit these sources. I am aware of the name of the museum members who worked on the documents, but Im not sure they as an individual need mentioning. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jampire1 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Check this please

Hi Longhair - You've been getting some nonsense from an editor by the name of Mrinformation which I have reverted of our user page - but I note that he has added comment to this image - Image:WIKI.jpg. Can you check and adjust as necessary please? Cheers! --VS ^talk 01:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perth assessments

Re Perth articles - I assume they're being treated as WA assessments (as they should be)? For some reason the Perth project, despite its large membership, is all but defunct as anything more than an organisational system for separating capital-specific articles from those related to either the state as a whole or to country areas. Orderinchaos78 09:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If possible, the two should be counted together as WA, unless the situation presently in place radically changes. (Just my thoughts of course - others may disagree) Orderinchaos78 09:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me :) Means we can rate things with respect to Perth for importance, but articles are counted under WA for FAs, GAs etc if I'm reading it correctly? Orderinchaos78 10:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh there's no hurry on it. I won't have time to investigate much until weekend after next - just spotted some of the changes going on and thought I'd put my blatant POV :) Orderinchaos78 10:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - totally unrelated email for you. Orderinchaos78 11:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Airports

Thanks for the help in reducing the categories. Rather than put one airport in each of two categories I created Category:Airports in the Australian Indian Ocean Territories with two airports. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tasty nightclub raid

Why oh why are you removing the image on the page? It is promotional material, from a now defunct entertainment site of great historical import. Can you please deprive me of my ignorance.Lentisco 03:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Townsville=yes

THANK YOU!!!! Wiki Townsvillia n 04:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the picture that's on Template:User WikiProject Townsville? at the moment it seems to be just a pic of a circle. Thanks, Wiki Townsvillia n 04:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Longhair, we have a out of date wikilink at the Wikiproject template, could you change the following:

in the following section:

{{#if:{{{past-acotf|}}}| {{!}} [[Image:ACOTF.png|30x30px|center]] {{!}} This {{#ifeq:{{{class|}}}|NA|non-article page|article}} was the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Collaboration|Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight]]''' ({{{past-acotf|}}}). For details on the improvements made to the article, see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Collaboration#History|history of past collaborations]].<includeonly>[[Category:Past Australia collaborations|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

Change this sentence:

For details on the improvements made to the article, see the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Collaboration#History|history of past collaborations]].<includeonly>[[Category:Past Australia collaborations|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

to:

For details on the improvements made to the article, see the [[Wikipedia:Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight/History|history of past collaborations]].<includeonly>[[Category:Past Australia collaborations|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

Thanks, Wiki Townsvillia n 07:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canberra=yes

Thanks for that - I forget that other projects exist - apart from those that I am embroiled with, trust your computer siutuation has improved.. Satu Suro 11:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TV=yes

You deserve some sort of award for having to trawl through all those god awful Australian TV articles! --Steve _(Slf67)^talk 08:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Apology to Longhair from Kyle

Please accept my apology for my snippity attitude regarding the Svetozar & Ruth Radakovich page which you flagged with a quick delete back on 14 February 2007 (UTC). I had been up late and and got a little cranky, after having spent my time working the page, and getting it flagged. I take it as a lesson learned.Kyle Thomas 00:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Clayton Utz

Hi Longhair,

Can you please take a look at the above article. It is on a notable topic and definitely deserves an article but in its current state seems unsalvageable, due to extreme POV and a total lack of citations. Any advice?--Mattinbgn/^talk 02:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. I wasn't so much looking for help to fix it (alyhough I appreciate any help you can provide) but more about how to flag it as an item needing attention, which you have done. Thanks again.--Mattinbgn/^talk 03:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cat issue

Hi, you might or might not have seen that I have been trawling through australian project categories finding little or no of the wp australia class=na thingy in them - but I have just come acrross a real humdinger (or should that be schwartz..) which is almost a full page of created sub categories which have maybe one or two articles per sub category. What would you do? Should I have good faith that someone will eventually populate them - should i tag them with needs populating - should I lead you to the page? I would be interested in a response, ta. Satu Suro 10:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - you got it (sorry about long delay between messages - dads taxi extended this evening) - what would you do? Satu Suro 12:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should explain (worth getting a cup of a hot drink before you read this, and archiving straight after reading it :)) )

With my tagging Indonesian project articles and cats - I am constantly aware of very low level stubs and short changed cats - that I tag wp indonesia, or the wp indonesia NA - and assume that there will come a crunch day to actually to put the issue to the project as a summary 'these cats are underpopped and need either amalgamting or cfd'ed, and trying to get some sense of what might have conceivable possibility of being populated at all' in a sub page of the project. However when i get to the Tas project - I find the sneakiest small articles and cats as well - which - I dont think I have been harsh enough - allowing for good faith for the very slow tas project to ever get momentum...)

(Decided to leave extensive issues re the Indonesian, Maritime History, West Australian and Tasmanian projects out for the moment - its gettting late - maybe its just a sip of the drink long rather than a full cup)

Well when I have been doing the recent x in australia stuff - and with the one that we know about - I dont have a problem with putting the underpop tag in each, and tagging them. what about that? If I do go to the notieboard my problem is i am off in a day or two for over a week and i wouldnt be able to back up or explain the process of tagging the cats to the less informed or less convinced ...Satu Suro 13:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

RE:WP:ARCHIVE

I've been bugged on this several times, and like I have to do, I have to turn you down. Hope you understand. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 14:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really want my talk page archived, well, there would be too many archives pretty soon. - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 14:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will never have my talk page archived. That is final! - Patricknoddy^{TALK (reply here)}^|^HISTORY 14:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ian King

Why is the deletion debate sorted out to fall into Australian deletion debates, not sports related deletion debate? Does the subject's claim to notability increases if he comes from Brisbane, than that he is a powerlifting champion and has trained world class athletes? Or is the sorting a part of regionalization of Wikipedia, which is very much experienced while editing Indian or Pakistani articles. Please, respond to my talk page. Aditya Kabir 04:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Executions

I listed them in one big lot at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_27#Category:X_executions. Messy; but more effective than listing them one at a time. --05:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Pong_Su.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pong_Su.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WP:AUS hierarchy

I noticed that discussion, and was thinking about it in the context of WP:ADEL. I have been considering reforming WP:ADEL into a WP:SA, as it would unsustainable to maintain both, and a need for WP:SA is becoming clearer. At the same time, it would be useful to retain Adelaide statistics for more focused editing. I'm not yet sure how we would integrate child (ADEL) statistics into the parent's (SA), whilst retaining the grandparent's (AUS). A possible crude hack might be to simply piggyback the parent's assessment categories on the child parameter. Thoughts?--cj | talk 15:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the west

Talk:Edmund Lockyer seems to have some odd red items relative to exploration - I have to get off and thought i should mention it to someone as i havent the time to investigate - it might be something really simple - havent checked. trust all is well Satu Suro 03:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - saulih's moniker hasnt flashed across my watch page of recent and I wasnt sure where to go - thanks for that Satu Suro 04:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me

But Martin Crowe isnt australian?123.255.54.19 14:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your welcome to the site, would like some help getting to knoe the place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Squrtle11 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the revert on my user page and the block :-) - Myanw 11:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers.

- Michael Billington (talk) 06:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Public secondary schools in Geelong

Thanks for that! It wasn't my intention to leave schools out of the list on purpose. I live in the Belmont/Highton/Grovedale part of Geelong, so some of the schools in the northern suburbs just slipped my mind. ;) --Candy-Panda 08:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re: Ian King

Thanks. Interesting indeed. How do you create a deletion sorting page for a specific Wikiproject? The project I am currently driving (Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Bangladesh or may be Wikipedia:WikiProject Bangladesh) might need it some day. I guess, a lot many of the Wikproject people haven't figured out that this is a possibility to explore. A pretty good idea it seems. Please, answer to my talk page. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 11:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks longhair

im still having some trouble referencing sources its a bit complicated.--Samerin 00:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

does my article look or sound alright though???????--Samerin 00:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i hope im not bothering you, just wanted to ask how i insert graphs in my article--Samerin 00:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

another question

i complied one article for wikipedia about 4 weeks ago and it was deleted. I just wanted to ask if there is any possibility that my article on balance of payments could be deleted in the future or its gonna stay there?--Samerin 01:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sunraysia

Well (and it's nice to change the subject to something more useful than above) I did manage to find a map that borders the area. I created an initial map/image for Mallee and Sunraysia (and adjusted after some useful comments from another editor) and that map - including references is up on both those pages (with some explanation on Talk Mallee). --VS ^talk 23:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Euston was determined by the Riverina Committee to be the furthest southwest part of the Riverina. Because the southern boundry of the Riverina is the New South Wales side of the Murray River Euston just makes it - BUT given the divergence of areas such as the Sunraysia and the Riverina in Australian geography (for example some Hattah is in Sunraysia and The Mallee) IMHO Euston could easily be in both the Riverina and Sunraysia. Hope that answers your question?--VS ^talk 12:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party of Italy

Hi Longhair. Could you please help me with this page about ortographic errors (I'm not an english mother-tongue)? Maybe you could put a template for that. I don't know how to do. thanks--Tompint 10:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC) orthographic, of or related to the study of correct spelling. ooops, I forgot the "h". Do you see?--Tompint 10:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC) Thank you very much. If I need more help I'll let you know.--Tompint 10:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Longhair thanks for your kind words and helpful comments.

Goodstone 11:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE REMOVE YOUR TAG...

THE ARTICLE WAS CREATED ONLY A FEW SECONDS AGO PER REQUEST AND IS IN THE PROCESS OF BEING DEVELOPED. YOUR DELETION TAG IS NOT HELPING ME EDIT THE ARTICLE ONE BIT. Nebraska bob 12:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Banned Gundagai Editor

Hi Longhair I think you had a bit to do with this topic - along with Golden Wattle etc. I think this editor is back under a different but actual 'real' user name as user:Rosinaharris. It looks like her 'real' identity was outed by someone at Talk:Gundagai, New South Wales (see last bit of history) and then she responded with some breaches of WP:NPA and just put her previous POV on the talk page - because she can't get it on the article page. I have opted to remove her posts but she is just returning them with further comments. Do you think that a protection of the Gundagai pages for a week or two might help? --VS ^talk 13:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I noticed Sara's helpful input also. I am and will continue to revert their edits. I notice also (FYI) that this person has set up this user page User:Lotsofpretenddegreeshere since being banned.--VS ^talk 22:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, understood and will assist (couldn't see block on that last account though?).--VS ^talk 23:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely - will know to look there next time.--VS ^talk 23:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And another with a slight change of name - User:Sheriidanst - have reverted edit to your talk page. --VS ^talk 00:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep noticed - have Wikipedia sockpuppets of Rosinaharris on my watchlist.--VS ^talk 00:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And another User:Naughtywattle have tagged with sockpuppet but awaiting block please. (Perhaps I should put my hand up to become an Administrator and I could help more quickly?)--VS ^talk 02:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have thought this editor Jessiemay (talk • contribs) may be just another sock/meat puppet of the banned editor for a little while - particularly given that her first edit HERE was in relation to a comment about terminology which I believe Golden Wattle related HERE to the banned editor. Seems too co-incidental and I could be wrong but is there a way of checking?--VS ^talk 02:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - thought so - thanks also for the link to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser--VS ^talk 06:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:67.9.18.119

Suggest revert & sprotect this user's talk page who you just banned. See page for reason. --Auto^{(talk / contribs)} 00:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check

So no more Hobart=yes, only Tasmania=yes ? Satu Suro 13:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be incorping the old ones (Hobart=yes, Tas=yes) at some stage, and did you have any further thoughts about the qld cat/subcat page? Satu Suro 12:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thoughts from Sarah

Sarah has put some important positive thoughts re this discussion under we left off. I have responded and told her I would let you know directly. --VS ^talk 21:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continual AfDs on Gordon Cheng

Hi Longhair - is there a rule about making AfDs continually until an article gets deleted? Gordon Cheng has already been nominated twice, and was only nominated this time as I kept removing the word "priest", which I have already explained on the talk page, is inaccurate with reference to the diocese that Gordon works in. Do you have any advice? JRG 00:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andy

Flloyd - all my memory of their early stuff is filed away in a part of my brain labelled - check with writtten refs only:) - yeah he has brought up an interesting issue - I hope he understands that the whole of the wa goeographical feature lists suffer under the same enormity Satu Suro 10:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah - the wikipedia servers did some very things to the lack of matching watch page time and contributions page times yesterday, very odd - I thought it was the big Qld cat page of many subcats with only one or two in most - but I'm not rushed - very close to packing and being off anyways... maybe in a week or two! Satu Suro 12:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not so easy - probably on tommorow as well - just to be a pain to friends and foes :) thanks for the best wishes anyways cheers Satu Suro 12:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW the talk page item between merbabu and matt57 might need watching :( Satu Suro 12:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that - when i do the count - I am reminded of issues and people that I havent seen for about 10,000 edits or so :) Satu Suro 12:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rename a page

Sorry if I bother you, Longhair. Could you help me to rename the page "Communist Party of Italy (1921–1926)" to "Communist Party of Italy"? Could you explain me how to do? I tried to understand with the help instructions, but no way... I can't find the move button. Thank you. --Tompint 02:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wikipedia is a very nice place to work. Today I found my move button. --Tompint 10:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protecting talk Gundagai

Noticed this and a great move. I think we may need to watch this one now! --VS ^talk 09:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria project

You should be thanked for that - there is now a sense of something - when it looks like that! - (could you possibly do the same for tassie?) - ... (just keeping my count up on your talk page :) ) Satu Suro 12:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very very interesting - do you consider editing by sockpuppets revertable on sight regardless of quality? (thats a trap - please dont answer) there has been an argument elsewhere on this - the legacy of errant editors leaves us an intriguing legacy :) Satu Suro 12:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its one of the characters whom I sent an email about recently - a supporter has attempted to defend edits by a puppet - and the supporter has been quite adamant that despite banning and puppeting that the edits remain ! Satu Suro 12:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bit more complicated about to email, sorry to bother...Satu Suro 12:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably my last for a week unless some clever person upsets me in the next hour or so :) cheers Satu Suro 12:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its rather horrible - has gone to some rather wierd and wonderful corners , sigh Satu Suro 12:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

email Satu Suro 02:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mildura

Thanks for confirming that Mildura, Victoria is a "city". I used Mildura as an example where I butted in to the RFC on talk:Halifax, Nova Scotia (there's confusion about a Regional City LGA), but thought "locality" didn't sound right. Kind of embarrassing that we've both edited the article several times with "locality" in the lead. --Scott Davis ^Talk 13:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page Communist Party of Italy (1921-1926)

Yes Longhair, maybe I did something wrong... sorry, I'm still learning. The reason because I want to delete that page is that nobody will write the name of the Party with the date, so it's useless. After I did it, I read that just an administrator can erase a page, sorry.
I did also a correction of all the mistakes and confusion around, about Italian Communist Party and Communist Party of Italy. It looks like Monthy Python's Problem but it's more tragical then a simple name. The PCd'I changed name after the stalinisation of the International Communist. Most of the links to Communist Party of Italy were directed to Italian Communist Party; I believe in the good faith of people, but after the II world war, the official historian of Italian Communist Party did a big effort to change the history of that period which is almost forgot. This is a good reason to put this part of the history in an encyclopedia. Isn't it? cheers.--Tompint 13:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ah...something else...sorry if I take advantage of your kindness... How can I add a pop up menu in the page? see this for instance (Gli storici 10 punti su cui si formò il Partito Comunista d'Italia): http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partito_Comunista_d%27Italia

Unspecified source for Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 17:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 17:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 21:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Jaidynleskie babysitter.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jaidynleskie babysitter.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 14:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Assessment of the Ford AU Falcon Article

Hello, I was wondering if you could please assess the Ford AU Falcon article for me. I have listed it on the 'current requests' article in WP: Australia (but I am very curious to what it will be rated at). Not to be rude or impatient, I am just very curious what it will be rated at. ThankyouHarrison-HB4026 04:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melb project article stats

Hey Longhair, someone has asked on my talk page if we can update the article progress thing on the WikiProject Melbourne, but I have no idea how the statistics are calculated or even where the numbers come from and I was just wondering if you know and if so, would you mind updating it sometime? Maths wasn't my thing at school and I'm sure I would just stuff it up if I tried to work it out! No hurry or anything. Cheers mate, Sarah 06:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind the above message, Longhair. I think it's been sorted. Thanks, Sarah 13:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]