User talk:Lokeshthimmana

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sadhu Chetty. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! joe•roe^t•c 18:10, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Buddha nobletruths.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Buddha nobletruths.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop changing the lead section of Subramanian Swamy. The lead is supposed to summarize the article below, and it's disruptive to remove lead text that summarizes sections below. Have you read the whole article? Such as for instance the well-sourced section Anti-Muslim views? Bishonen | tålk 11:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you recently removed content from Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ab207 (talk) 06:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tibet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]