User talk:Loisopokupr

This is Loisopokupr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Langston Uibel (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb and Wikipedia are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Langston Uibel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Langston Uibel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Loisopokupr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Langston Uibel (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Langston Uibel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Langston Uibel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sulfurboy,

what exactly is the "problem" with the sources? Are ID MAGAGAZINE, Vogue, Asos not verified sources? As well as german Wikipedia Page as reference. I understand that Wikipedia and IMDB are not accepted but it could help to get an general idea of the relevance. I am looking forward to your response and what i can do to improve the article.

You said it yourself, sources like wikipedia and imdb are not reliable. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. That is why I have added other sources. Should I remove Wikipedia and IMDB? Thank You

Your submission at Articles for creation: Langston Uibel (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The new sources are interviews that do not demonstrate the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Langston Uibel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Langston Uibel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Langston Uibel

Hello, Loisopokupr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Langston Uibel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello Loisopokupr. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Loisopokupr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Loisopokupr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I completely understand why you could think so but I am just a film and series enthusiast. Or one could say fan. Thank you Loisopokupr (talk) 10:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you have "pr", which usually means "public relations", in your username? 331dot (talk) 11:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s just a gimmick. I’m sorry for the confusion! Loisopokupr (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For reasons I cannot disclose, I don't think it's just a gimmick. You didn't pick Langston Uibel at random to edit about. The more forthcoming you are with us, the more we can help you. 331dot (talk) 11:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Langston Uibel

Hello, Loisopokupr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Langston Uibel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Langston Uibel (August 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by UtherSRG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Per the previously G13'd and rejected draft.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Loisopokupr, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Loisopokupr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Loisopokupr: Please read the note here on how to properly disclose. The text you put on your user page is not sufficient. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Loisopokupr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have added the transparency note.Loisopokupr (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not sufficient, and your contributions have been inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 10:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand that it is a mistake that I did not disclose my link yo

to Langston Uibel. I do not think it fair that one provide notability standards and then does not accept when these are met. Langston Uibel has had various major parts in shows and films including Unorthodox, How to sell drugs online (fast) as well as most recently Afire. Loisopokupr (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, you’ve done nothing but spam. Disclosure does not give you carte blanche to continue doing so. Courcelles (talk) 18:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why have I spammed? I am trying to understand and work by your principles. I made some mistakes and I have apologized. There was no bad intent. I have read all notability criteria and it simply not clear how they are not met. Loisopokupr (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]