User talk:Logjohn

Ways to improve Max Levien

Hello, Logjohn,

Thank you for creating Max Levien.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add clear references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tobias Akselrod

Hello, Logjohn,

Thank you for creating Tobias Akselrod.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Helper202. I noticed that you recently removed content from Per Savio without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Helper202 (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heinz Pannwitz

Hi @Logjohn: How goes it| What is actually happening here? It wasn't clear from your edit summary. I reverted the last time because you had linked to a redirect. Redirect are for users, not for linking to. You link only to the article. I thought the link was ok. Am I missing something. scope_creep^Talk 21:13, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. I removed the link altogether. In hindsight I realise that perhaps the whole mentioning of the Machtubergriff is unnecessary, as its not as well-known and used in the English-speaking world, as it is in Europe.

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julius Martov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yevgeny Zamyatin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Svetlana Kryuchkova.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paris Commune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belleville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

George William Gordon

added a link pointing to Kingston

Morant Bay rebellion

added a link pointing to Kingston

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ellie Greenwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucas Fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Ždanov

I moved the sailor back to Sergei Ždanov for a couple of reasons. First the single source spelt his name that way and gave Sergei Zdanov as an alternate. Secondly, the single source was not sufficient to establish notability, it was just a listing, and so I redirected him to Sailing at the 1980 Summer Olympics – 470. If sources can be found to establish notability then his article can be restored. I then moved the footballer back to the undisabiguated title. At the same time I redirected all the people on the Sailing at the 1980 Summer Olympics – 470 article who finished below fourth as they also lacked evidence of notability. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The single English language source you refer to does not follow English translitteration standard from cyrillic Russian. I did look for a Russian language source for Сергей Жданов, but in general ruwp only, or at least mainly, list Olympic Medalists. You decision to revert back to an incorrect name form is highly illogical, Jim (as Spock would say on Star Trek). Logjohn (talk) 20:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't really matter at this point as Sergei Ždanov is a redirect to Sailing at the 1980 Summer Olympics – 470 and Sergei Zhdanov has a hatnote telling readers to look at Sailing at the 1980 Summer Olympics – 470 for the sailor. No matter how the name is spelt people will get there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 02:32, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Yung Lean, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! TylerBurden (talk) 23:46, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought it was on general interest, unlike his 'work career' at McDonalds, and uncontroversial since his family relations are generally known, and mentioned elsewhere in related atricles here on enwp. But you keep up the good work here I'm sure! Logjohn (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sky being blue is common knowledge, who Yung Lean's grandparent is, not so much. Wikipedia is based on verifiability. TylerBurden (talk) 18:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear "Sir Knight of Knowlegde", the sky isn't blue, we only percieve it as such. What a horrible and misleading example to use by a "mr authority on wikipedia things"... Logjohn (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not exactly helping yourself by violating WP:CIVIL on top of the WP:BLP violation. TylerBurden (talk) 20:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leather Nun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]