User talk:Helper202

Welcome!

Hello, Helper202, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

If you find yourself cleaning up vandalism frequently, you might be interested in patrolling recent changes.

For the WikiProject on vandalism cleanup, see the Counter-Vandalism Unit.

To make vandalism reverts easier you can ask for the rollback feature to be enabled for your registered Wikipedia account.

Below are more pages related to vandalism:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peacocks in the Premiership

I guess you (and I) have met one of the famous British white supremacist football hooligans. Editing Wikipedia is very educational! Thank you for your vigilance. Bishonen | tålk 16:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Not really something on my bucket list but there you go. :) Thank you for the quick action. Helper202 (talk) 16:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SummerPhD^v2.0 22:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shelly1985

I only added phrases from another Wikipedia page, so please add it back in. Shelly1985 (talk) 01:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit which is definitely not content from another Wikipedia page. Helper202 (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no it wasn't

please stop posting messages to me

Nice friends you've got

Would you like this page semiprotected for a while? Bishonen | tålk 16:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

I think the IP is blocked for a bit so I'm probably ok for the time being unless you think it is necessary. Helper202 (talk) 16:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ladino

Are you anti-Sephardi? Serious question. Why did you remove my "Ladino" post? The Lost Ladino (talk) 20:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was original research and it violated WP:NPOV to say "Others who know better..." Wikipedia deals with what can be verfied, not what someone considers "truth". Your second edit provided a source that never even mentioned Ladino people. Helper202 (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No response... Why?

It is the third time I am asking why my editing was reverted?

Hi, I have added that site (https://hahahafunnyjokes.blogspot.com) in the "Available websites" section... It was surprising for me that you have removed the site just because you don't like it!? WHY? FreeBasic service allowed this site and it should be in the section of the Available website... what's wrong with it? Please add this site again or give me a logical reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org#Available_websites

Are You There...? Could you please respond to it? I am waiting for your answer.

It is an unremarkable blog. Please cease attempting to use Wikipedia to promote your website. Helper202 (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because your website isn't available Øřä ťëə (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by reverting

Don't engage in drive-by reverting like you did on Malena Ernman. You never edited the article before nor you provided any argument how WP:UNDUE wasn't violated. I highly recommend you to use talk page when your basis for reversion is brutally weak. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 14:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UNDUE is about neutrality and not making mountains out of molehills to skew the perspective. Noting that she is also the parent of a famous person doesn't meet this criteria. You might want to follow your own advice and actually use the article talk page instead of blanking content you don't like. Helper202 (talk) 14:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through the article history you have never edited that article before so why does that criteria somehow only apply to me? There is no guideline that states the person with a longer history with the article gets to dictate the content of the article. See WP:OWN. Helper202 (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just reading a guideline that you don't even understand is far from providing explanation for your disruptive editing by misusing your editing privileges is not going to remain unnoticed. You are the one engaging in drive-by reverting and being problematic this is why I pointed out that your edit warring is far from being justified Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 14:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in WP:UNDUE speaks to removing content from the lede which does not in any way alter the perception of the subject of the article. It is about neutrality. The article talk page is the proper venue for this discussion and on that page please quote the relevant part of the guidelines you believe is being violated instead of just repeatedly claiming it is being violated. Helper202 (talk) 15:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]