User talk:LocNguyen

Proposed deletion of Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm

Hello, LocNguyen. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Domdeparis (talk) 15:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LocNguyen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LocNguyen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. LocNguyen, thanks for creating Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. this player does not yet meet WP:NFOOTY as he is a youth player. the sources are too weak.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 09:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I noticed that in this edit to Nguyễn Tuấn Anh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm

The article Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Khắc Khiêm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ClubOranje^T 11:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in James Milner, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please refer to WP:MOSBOLD. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Daniel Sturridge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:21, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Lazar Marković, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please refer to WP:OVERLINK. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honours icons

Stop adding purely decorative icons to the honour sections, they are decorative and add nothing to the article and should therefore not be used, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 95 "Image in trophy list" section. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snowflake91 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you illiterate or what exactly dont you understand about the icons policy (WP:ICONDECORATION), since you started adding them again? Snowflake91 (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Please refer to WP:OVERLINK. We don't link to major geographic locations. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Thể Công F.C.. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Moses Oloya. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 14:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mai Đức Chung

Hello LocNguyen,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mai Đức Chung for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

GMG ^talk 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LocNguyen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Ings. Please refer to #Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Sources are essential for all articles. Please stop creating articles with no references, such as 2017 International U-21 Thanh Niên Newspaper Cup. Please also be aware that WP:Communication is required; please respond to messages from other editors. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bùi Duy Thường

Hi, I'm Boleyn. LocNguyen, thanks for creating Bùi Duy Thường!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please do not add half-finished articles to the mainspace.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Y Eli Niê

Hi, I'm Boleyn. LocNguyen, thanks for creating Y Eli Niê!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please stop creating unfunushed articles in mainspace.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Vietnamese clubs in the AFC Cup

Hi, I'm Boleyn. LocNguyen, thanks for creating Vietnamese clubs in the AFC Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Moved to draftspace as it has no verified information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Vietnamese clubs in the AFC Champions League

Hi, I'm Boleyn. LocNguyen, thanks for creating Vietnamese clubs in the AFC Champions League!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please WP:INLINECITE spurces.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 21:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

The next time you create an unreferenced article, I will take this to ANI and you risk being blocked. Again, WP:Communication is required - I have tried to help solve this issue many, many times. I am moving the article back to draftspace. If you think it is ready for mainspace, discuss it with me first. I am trying to help. Boleyn (talk) 17:37, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't responded and you have done exactly the same thing instantly after this message - created another unreferenced article in mainspace [1] and refused to respond to my messages and communicate. Wikipedia is a colloborative project - we need to work together - an you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for failure to communicate with other editors and change disruptive behavior. If you promise to communicate with other editors in the future, please let us know in an unblock request. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 00:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Malinaccier, this user now seems to be editing from [2], all articles edited by this IP are in last couple of days and on same topics, mostly articles this usere was working on, in both draft and mainspace. LocNguyen, please see WP:SCRUTINY. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for block evasion. Malinaccier (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LocNguyen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My English is not good, so I do not understand very well what you say. I only know that my current WIki account is locked, I do not understand the reason. Did I infringe the copyright? Please explain the reason for me. Thank you

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:ANI

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LocNguyen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want more people to understand football in Vietnam by creating new pages, not intention to sabotage. Please unlock this account. Thank you!!

Decline reason:

The reasons for your block are explained above. You must address them in future unblock requests. Right now your unblock requests have basically said "I don't know why I'm blocked...please unblock me." You need to re-read the comments above about why you were blocked, explain your understanding of those reasons, and tell us how you will address your future edits so your behavior is not the same. only (talk) 14:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LocNguyen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017 International U-21 Thanh Niên Newspaper Cup

Hello, LocNguyen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017 International U-21 Thanh Niên Newspaper Cup".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 08:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2016 Vietnam women's football championship

Hello, LocNguyen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2016 Vietnam women's football championship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 16:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vietnam national under-21 football team

Hello, LocNguyen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vietnam national under-21 football team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:15, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]