User talk:Lmarksrp2018

Welcome!

Hello, RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:56, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... this page is stating what the company does. --RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic (talk) 20:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radiuspoint (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Radiuspoint and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Radiuspoint, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lmarksrp2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

lmarksrp2018 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my content was blocked because it did not meet the requirement and it was for advertising or promotion. I also understand this is against policy. I will not do this again. I would like to still continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Please remove my article request. I request to unblock my Wikipedia under a new username for purposes of posting allowed content.

Accept reason:

Accepted rename request, will review unblock request below separately. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What articles or topic areas are you interested in editing? 331dot (talk) 07:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have globally renamed RadiusPoint-ExpenseLogic to Lmarksrp2018. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lmarksrp2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my content was blocked because it did not meet the requirement and it was for advertising or promotion. I also understand this is against policy. I will not do this again. I would like to still continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Please remove my article request. I request to unblock my Wikipedia for purposes of posting allowed content. Content would be related to IT, Technology, and other interests.

Accept reason:

You appear to understand the problem and you have agreed not to write about your company (and I have deleted the draft article as you requested). So, after consulting with the blocking admin, I have unblocked your account. Welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]