User talk:Llouest

Arnold Wilson

Hi there. Your new article, A.t. wilson, is a duplicate article of Arnold Wilson. Perhaps you can work in your materiel into the older article, and then make a redirect? Te ke 15:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tsuruga Port (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Akita, Chukyo, Nara, Meiji, Container, Nikkei, Niigata, Fukui and Hanshin

Tsuruga, Fukui (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Toyama

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Japanese literature may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Fumiko Hayashi]] (1903-1951]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fumiko Hayashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haruo Umezaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fumiko Hayashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kinder Morgan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NASSCO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Farro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

way, and might therefore be considered faro, as is [[épeautre]] (''Triticum spelta''), in France (where, like for faro in Italy, there is "petit", "moyen" and "grand" [[épeautre]]. [[Common wheat]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ishigaki Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oregon LNG, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department Of Energy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Felda Global Ventures Holdings may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

company Century Logistics Holdings Bhd was mentioned as a possible partner into this exercise <ref>[http://www.thestar.com.my/Business/Business-News/2014/03/14/Felda-Globalexplores-asset-injection/}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Llouest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keiretsu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mizuho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Llouest. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude Farrère, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierre Benoit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hanshin and Keihin

Shizuoka, Shizuoka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hanshin and Keihin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hanshin and Keihin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Black Elk

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/another-vision-of-black-elk. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some of the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LNG Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TransCanada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fujisawa, Kanagawa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hikiji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Llouest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ito Ogawa

The article Ito Ogawa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siegfried Bing

I've reverted your addition of this person to the Bing disambiguation page a second time. Please read the edit summaries. -- Fyrael (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ito Ogawa) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ito Ogawa.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Its currently still a stub, so if you can add any more (sourced) content that would be great, but either way I have marked this article as reviewed!

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DannyS712 (talk) 01:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Part of your addition to Kawasaki Heavy Industries has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:57, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your email. Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the first bot report. Here is a link to the second bot report. Click on the iThenticate links to view the overlap. Webpages are marked as "Copyright © 2018 Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd. All rights reserved" and "Copyright © Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. All rights reserved." — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your email. Under Wikipedia's copyright policy, we are not permitted to add copyright material copied from elsewhere. If you wish to add content, please do so in your own words, and cite your sources. Sorry but it's simply not practical to discuss each violation of the copyright policy with the editor involved. It takes me four to six hours per day to clear the daily copyvio reports, and prior consultation with the person who performed each edit would double or triple that workload. By the end of the week I would have hundreds of unresolved cases to clear up. Clear-cut violations are immediately removed, as is permitted by the policy.

Regarding the article Ito Ogawa, which you mentioned in your email, that article was never deleted but rather was proposed for deletion, as it had no sources. You never did add any sources; this was done by other people. I see you've been here quite a while, but I suggest you review some of our basic policies: WP:Biographies of living persons, WP:copyrights, WP:Sources. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:55, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your email. Copying from copyright websites is not permitted; it's a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't do it any more, or you risk being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taos art colony, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Ray and Edward Corbett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse L. Nusbaum

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I've read it and I'm concerned by the fact that many facts aren't linked up to specific citations, making it hard to verify that the content is actually true!

In order to avoid this problem, I recommend giving citations names when you create them, by putting a name into the "ref name" box. Then, by selecting the "named reference" control in the edit window, you can put in citations where they're needed. Blythwood (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blythwood, Thanks for your comment. I generally understand your concern but fail to understand how it applies to the article I created on the archeologist and photographer Jesse L. Nusbaum. Indeed, purposely, I added about three dozen references, i.e. books, documents and links, which cover any and all quotations...and much more. So, could you please be more specific about the improvements I could bring to it? Thanks, regards Llouest (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk messages

Hi. I saw that you created Reply to Talk message, expressing confusion about how to reply to messages. I have tagged that page for deletion, but I wanted to show you Help:Talk pages, which should be useful to you. Hope this helps, --DannyS712 (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DannyS712, Thanks for your quick reply. I am trying to use the method indicated in this Help: Talk section you mention. I hope it works (but why the answer button is labelled 'Edit' and not simply 'Answer'?). regards, Llouest (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Jesse L. Nusbaum. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa. Thanks for your comment, which I understand in general, but do not see on which specific points it applies. Indeed, when I have used information from 'Public Domains' (National Park Service, Smithsonian Institute, museums, books, newspapers...etc), I have put it in quotation marks and/or referred it through a link with the appropriate section of the relevant Public Domain. I would appreciate if you could pinpoint which segments may require to be fixed, and how. Note that Blythwood had made a similar comment earlier, and I had replied to him similarly. Regards, Llouest (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesse L. Nusbaum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:00, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at WP:Help desk, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chabahar Port, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Konarak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etzedek24 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing was changed since the last declination. Topic is probably notable but needs more sourcing beyond the one tertiary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 20:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Llouest! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 20:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint-Esprit, Pyrénées-Atlantiques

Hello, Llouest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint-Esprit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Samuel Horton (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A minority of the references are bare links. Such references are not desirable but they're tolerable. The majority of the references are simply unusable. As an example, "William Samuel Horton (1865-1936) | Terenchin". Who or what is or was "Terenchin"? If this is on the web, where is it on the web? If it's a journal article, then what's the title of the journal, and what's the volume number and date? If it's a book or booklet, what's the publisher, and what's the ISBN or (if it doesn't have one) then an informative OCLC? Incidentally, it's not necessary to repeat a reference: see Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: using a source more than once.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Samuel Horton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Samuel Horton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Samuel Horton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Samuel Horton. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Samuel Horton has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Samuel Horton. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 02:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Samuel Horton has been accepted

William Samuel Horton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bkissin,

Thanks for validating the creation of this article.

I have one question: you say "Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request". How is this possible?

Please note that I have been contributing to Wikipedia both in English and French since 2006 (initially with an article on Arnold Wilson, a British army officer and statesman), and, since then, I have created a dozen new articles on Wikipedia English or French, as well as contributed hundreds of additions to existing articles on various subjects on which I am familiar or expert.

When I wrote this latest article on the American impressionist painter William Samuel Horton, a painter I knew and about whom Wikipedia English was lacking an article, I just 'filed' it without posting any request for approval. Actually, the article was quickly stopped by a reviewer named 'Hoary' who claimed the article was not enough detailed...while my English draft was more detailed and backed-up than the article in Wikipedia French which had been already on line for 2 years (and to which I later contributed additions).

Thanks for your clarifications,

Best regards

Llouest Llouest (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oshika Peninsula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayukawa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether you could fix the references you inserted on Euronav with this edit; it's hard to work out which references you had intended. Specifically, what are references [10] to [13]? Klbrain (talk) 16:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don't think I was the one who inserted these 10 to 13 references. In any case, they are factual, i.e. a Press Release from Euronav and articles from various Belgium newspapers.

In any case, this Wikipedia article is now obsolete as, in 2023, a major development occurred whereby Euronav and Frontline eventually cancelled their planned merger, and Euronav main Belgium shareholders bought out Frontline interests by transferring them 28 VLCC tankers. This will have to be added to the article.

Best,

Llouest Llouest (talk) 15:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]