User talk:Lizzie Harrison/Archive 1

Jack

Please don't add Jack as a 10th Dr. companion until after Utopia airs. WP:Crystal. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Please don't add information about future episodes. The below warning applies. Do not remove warnings, or you risk getting blocked from editting. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Template:Tenthdoctorcompanions on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Template:Tenthdoctorcompanions page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you refuse to wait until Utopia airs before posting its information....

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 day. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. UtherSRG (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. UtherSRG (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Mallory merger

Hello Lizzie, I've replied to you at Talk:Controversy over Harry Potter. Best, --Fbv65e del / ☑t / ☛c || 01:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heart in NCIS template

I see your reasons for puttng a heart in the template between palmer and lee, but don't agree that it should be in there. Please feel free to discuss it, as we appreciate any contributions you are able to offer. ----Steve 20:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NCIS WIKI

I'm an NCIS fan too and I think that the NCIS wiki is just sad. It really needs help. Mooapau *Talk to Me 21:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Story arcs in Doctor Who

Perhaps "who cares" was too strong a wording on my part but in any event...Is this part of some quest to publicly verify that the present day scenes in 42 did indeed happen on a Thursday. The sentence tells you it's not important within it's own scope. If a senetence said: "The Doctor had tea in the episode but it wasn't specifically stated whether it was tea time or not so this sentence is truly a meaningless piece of trivia about tea time." what would you think? If you truly cared it owuld mean either you're interested in createing some sort of national movement to verify the day "42" takes place on or you think it's very important that people who go to this page know that British elections happen on Thursdays. Personally if I want to know what day British elections are on I would go to Elections in the United Kingdom, not Story arcs in Doctor Who. Sorry if I sound abrupt here. --Dr who1975 21:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean... if there was an actual contradiction... like the episode takes place on a wednesday... I could see why we include the sentence... but there is no contradiction.... just an ommision of information. --Dr who1975 21:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Template:Catagory:Fellowship of the Ring

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:Catagory:Fellowship of the Ring, by Sam8, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:Catagory:Fellowship of the Ring is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:Catagory:Fellowship of the Ring, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Template:Catagory:Fellowship of the Ring itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Companions

I fixed your change at {{doctorwhobox}}. Will ^{(We're flying the flag all over the world)} 19:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Frog

Template:Frog has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.

Tony DiNozzo

{help-me} I was referencing Tony Dinozzo with cite episodes but the list came out wrong. Can tell me how to fix it or fix it yourself

The problem is caused when you try to put a reference in by having code like His middle name initial is D <ref name="Frame"> when you actually need His middle name initial is D <ref name="Frame"/> (note the extra '/').

You can have a go at fixing it yourself, or use {{helpme}} again and someone will do it for you :-) --Commander Keane 17:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Arthur (Doctor Who)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arthur (Doctor Who), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arthur (Doctor Who) provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arthur (Doctor Who), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Arthur (Doctor Who) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Owen Harper

Please stop removing Owen Harper from the category Fiction murderers. It was decided through consensus on the article's talk page that he would remain in the category as he killed Jack, not knowing that Jack couldn't die. -Trampikey^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support :)

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Sorry if I snapped at you earlier; I'm not going through the best of periods on Wikipedia at the moment, which you could probably guess from reading my talk page. It's difficult to see if I'll emerge triumphant or with my tail between my legs, but thanks for lightening things up a bit :-) Serendipodous 18:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]