Jump to content

User talk:Liverpoolpics/Archive 15

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 20

Your draft article, Draft:Domenic Stansberry

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Domenic Stansberry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brede Skistad (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kohlrabi Pickle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 05:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
International Union of Kettlebell Lifting, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 16:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiasognathus sombrus (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chitrella regina has been accepted

Chitrella regina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kjell Markset

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kjell Markset".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Chiasognathus sombrus has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Chiasognathus sombrus. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiasognathus sombrus (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sissel Calmeyer (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SMB99thx was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SMB99thx my edits! 09:44, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghada Chreim Ata (December 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SMB99thx was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SMB99thx my edits! 09:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Ruthford Pedersen (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghada Chreim Ata (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 12:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sissel Calmeyer (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 12:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chiasognathus sombrus has been accepted

Chiasognathus sombrus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Ruthford Pedersen (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marcopolo (TV channel)

Hello, Liverpoolpics. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcopolo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teddy Moen (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bård Wiggen (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 04:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: World Landsailing Organisation has been accepted

World Landsailing Organisation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolomedes venmani has been accepted

Dolomedes venmani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [utc] 07:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Ruthford Pedersen (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nina Furu (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 10:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Identity of images

Hi, the file name of an image in Commons can be misleading, as with File:Cyclosternum fasciatum, adult female.JPG. If you look at the category into which this image is placed, you'll see that it's "Davus fasciatus", which the World Spider Catalog indeed confirms is now the accepted scientific name. I've learnt by experience that the categories in Commons are often more accurate than the file names. Also, if you check the list of species in the article Cyclosternum you'll see that Cyclosternum fasciatum is not there, which should raise a warning flag. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nina Furu (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Liverpoolpics! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NTG Bærum (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 06:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finn Hauberg Mortensen has been accepted

Finn Hauberg Mortensen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Important advice

However, when you translate an article from another language, you must indicate this in the edit summary and the talk page, preferably giving the link to the exact version of the page.. You also need to copy over the references and publications. Converting the CITE templates can be tricky, but you can at least copypaste the rendered text from the page, rather than give the impression that the article is unreferenced. For the article above, I also added the list of publications and added links Please remember to copy over things like this.

Whether it will probably pass AfD is the criterion for acceptance . The article as you submitted it would not have been accepted, because I don't think it likely that it would pass AfD,. With what I added, I think it might, though I'm still not certain. We really ned reviews of his books, and that's something very difficult to do without knowing thelanguage and being in the country. DGG ( talk ) 19:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Château de Carros has been accepted

Château de Carros, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 17:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
I accepted this after adding what references there were, and the key links to other articles. I am quite doubtful it would have been likely to pass AfD otherwise. I've done this work for you twice now; please do it yourself in the future. DGG ( talk ) 19:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nina Furu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, What this needs is reviews of her books. That is what will show notability as an author . Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 19:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:NTG Bærum has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission,A school can be notable for having multiple notable students. But there has to be actual evidence of that which can be verified, for each person. It would help even more if there is some 3rd partry reliable source commenting on this. Add this material, notify me,, and I will re-review Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 19:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Ruthford Pedersen (December 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I and three other reviews agree that this will not pass AfD in enWP, so there is no point in working on it further.
DGG ( talk ) 20:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Haudricourt (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilhelm Benque (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2020 (UTC)