User talk:Littlepeach1

April 2022

Hello, I'm Ïvana. I noticed that you recently removed content from ValidSoft without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ïvana (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Littlepeach1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page ValidSoft, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to ValidSoft. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investgation

Wanted to give you a heads up, there is a sockpuppet investigation against you:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Littlepeach1. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 22:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Littlepeach1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason= I only have one account, this one~~~~}} Littlepeach1 (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason= I only have one account, this one Littlepeach1 (talk) 21:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)}[reply]