Jump to content

User talk:Littlelulu89

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Littlelulu89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be a memoir that only promotes him and his ideas and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I had to delete the article. WP is not a place for memorials, or for reprinting material published elsewhere. It is possible that an article on him will be acceptable, but if you wish to try again, please keep the following in mind:

1. A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished. Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable, as was indeed the case. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)

2. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the person and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to his family. This is not the place for extensive biographical details.

3. For his work to be considered notable, the importance of it must be proven by references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. any patents or publications he may have , while relevant content, do not by themselves prove notability, unless the patents are actually exploited to produce notable products and the articles are widely cited by other scientists or physicians.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. And keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of press releases or web sites, which are usually more expansive.

Please do not submit the material again, unless you can meet all of these conditions. DGG ( talk ) 20:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer

[edit]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 23:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/dr-phillip-petillo-included-in-distinguished-cambridge-whos-who-registry-212528.php. As a copyright violation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phillip J. Petillo PhD, Luthier-Engineer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted your submission. Wikipedia cannot hold copyright material, not even in sandboxes or AfC submission pages, not even temporarily. Assertion of permission to use material is not enough for Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license - please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
Even if the copyright issue were resolved, this material would not be suitable for an encyclopedia article, as explained by DGG above. JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Littlelulu89&oldid=552325651"