User talk:Little Bizarre Dio

Welcome to Wikipedia, Little Bizarre Dio! Thank you for your contributions. I am QuackGuru and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! QuackGuru (talk) 00:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Little Bizarre Dio, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Little Bizarre Dio! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kill 'Em All, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Obscenity controversies in music

Please don't the category Category:Obscenity controversies in music unless the article actually mentions an obscenity controversy. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of adaptations of works by Stephen King, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Shining and Spit it Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Songs written for films

Please be sure that articles you add to Category:Songs written for films are actually written for a film and not just used in a film as Mad World. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please go back through your edits and adjust them to be correct. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not add Category:Songs written for films unless the song was written for a film. A song being used in a film does not necessarily mean that it was written for the film. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pumped Up Kicks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to All Star (song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at One Week (song).

Last warning for the Category:Songs written for films issue - FlightTime (open channel) 19:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Box office bomb, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 05:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon controversies

Please only add Category:Cartoon controversies to articles when they mention an actual controversy. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 03:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Little Bizarre Dio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wild Orchid and Scholastic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 14:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding fake data and sources

You added five films to the chart at List of box office bombs along with sources yet not a single one checks out. First of all the source that you predominantly rely on ("The Greatest Film Flops at FilmSite) has not been updated in 2015, so it is impossibel for you to be getting the data from there. In the case of "Penguins of Madagascar" its losses have been logged at $49 million, as you can see Talk:List_of_box_office_bombs#Trimmed_list. In the case of "Transformers: The Last Knight" you refer to this Hollywood Reporter article which is about the biggest flops of 2016, and published before Transformers even came out. This isn't just a case of adding erronesous data to the chart, you have deliberately tried to cover your tracks by using existing sources that don't check out. Have you got an explanation for this before I draw an administrator's attention to your behavior? Betty Logan (talk) 02:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scholastic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Film Studio

Your recent editing history at Template:Film Studio shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
A navigation box is not suppose to list every article in the category as you are doing at Template:Film Studio, by adding obscure film production companies. Per WP:NAVBOX, "Navigation templates are particularly useful for a small, well-defined group of articles; templates with a large number of links are not forbidden, but can appear overly busy and be hard to read and use." There are the categories to handle all in a particular category. Spshu (talk) 16:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Because I Got High. I see that you have been repeatedly warned about unsourced category additions, but have decided to ignore the warnings and not discuss the issue. Please consider this your final warning. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 20:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

...and now we've established that you are reading your talk page. - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously @Little Bizarre Dio: , what's the deal? Why add these Meme CATs to songs obviously not memes? Dave Dial (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@SummerPhDv2.0 and Dave Dial: This editor has a track record for adding untrue claims to articles (see my concerns above). I had decided to give them the benefit of the doubt but unfortunately Little Bizarre Dio has persisted with this disturbing pattern on behavior. Personally I think we have run out of road. Do you guys want me to take it to ANI? Betty Logan (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, after reading more of this Talk page & what you're referring to, it seems obvious this user has some kind of sneaky vandalism agenda. So the user should be blocked until they can demonstrate they understand Wiki policies better or prove they are not here to disrupt the project. Dave Dial (talk) 21:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Betty Logan (talk) 22:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This block isn't set indefinitely in order to keep you away forever and put the idea in your head that you're not welcome back, but I set an indefinite block because I think we need to have an unblock request and conversation first before giving your editing privileges back. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]