User talk:LittleFrog

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LittleFrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why am I being penalised for working quietly, efficiently and causing no problem at all. I am a good worker, this has gone on for too long and is not fair. I should be able to work as I have done. I am a good editor and have made quite literally HUNDREDS of contributions. Leave me be and please just unblock me and show me a bit more respect than I have been given

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, namely abusing multiple accounts. Step hen 02:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LittleFrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a good editor. That is why I should be unblocked regardless of the way I have edited in the past. This is truely silly

Decline reason:

You may be a good editor, you may not be. But you cannot be unblocked until admins are assured that you will edit within policy - namely, that you will not abuse multiple accounts. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LittleFrog (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only way to prove it is to unblock me. I have agreed many times to contribute correctly and each time I have been ignored. It is fair that I be unblocked as I have done nothing wrong. My accounts were all locked so I could not even defend myself - that is why I have a new name.

Decline reason:

You must appeal with your principal account. If that account's talk page is locked, you must use another venue of appeal as described in WP:Appealing a block. Sandstein 22:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the unblock mailing list at unblock-en-llists.wikimedia.org. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]