User talk:LisaSuz
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, LisaSuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Maryland Salem Children's Trust does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Salem draft
[edit]LisaSuz, let me create a draft and let you see how it should be 'Wikified' for consistently with the Wikipedia project's protocls.
- Check out this draft based upon YOUR last contribution to Maryland Salem Children's Trust.
- Check out this, which was my longest, most complete version of Salem International.
- My biographical article about Gottfried Müller[1] was deleted several times.
The 'problem' or 'noncompliance' is that you merely copied text from previously printed Salem literature. When you do that, the article becomes less of an online encyclopedia and more of a 'advertisement' for the 'entity'.
Further, the article failed to comply with the standard 'style sheet' - and sometimes the noncompliance is egregious!
Finally, you claimed divine guidance as part of the Wikipedia article, in effect claiming the authority of Wikipedia for your claim. MaynardClark (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)