User talk:Lionstaken

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lionstaken! Thank you for your contributions. I am Nkansahrexford and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Nkansahrexford (talk) 00:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lionstaken! Drop by the Teahouse anytime!

Hello! Lionstaken, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 05:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent with Global message delivery.

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Madhuri Dixit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Thank you for your contribution to Madhuri Dixit, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. I have noticed that you added a blank section called In the Media with no content in it. Won't be tolerated hence forth. If you have any problem in understanding or you want to add any content, please feel free to ping me. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Madhuri Dixit

Hi, don't just add "In the Media", if you would like to add that section then add something with reliable sources, otherwise let it be as it is as now. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madhuri Dixit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BollyJeff | talk 02:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BollyJeff | talk 00:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing. ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ ^Talk ^Email 03:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You either don't understand what is happening or turning a blind eye to the above warnings. Inspite of them, you have continuously added unnnecessary content, fabricating the text present in reliable sources, adding unnecessary sections etc. I strongly suggest you discuss the changes you want to add (which I believe you do in good faith) in the talk page of the article and reach a consensus. I have notified an administrator of your behavior. You should either stop this, else an indefinite block is emminent. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:50, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

I have reported you to WP:AIV for your edits

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madhuri Dixit, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MLA and Camp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Lionstaken/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 21:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Madhuri Dixit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing violations of the WP:Biographies of living persons policy, despite many warnings and two previous short blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 13:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anything added to a biography needs to be verifiable from a reliable, published source. There is no place in Wikipedia for gossip or personal opinions, but you have persisted in adding them despite two previous short blocks. You will not be unblocked unless you can convince an administrator that you have read WP:Biographies of living persons and WP:Verifiability, understand what you have been doing wrong, and will not continue in the same way. JohnCD (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionstaken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi,im one of the Wikipidia user.I am actually Madhuri Dixit's fan im always trying to update her wiki page so everybody can know about her..but plzzz Im requesting plzzz don't block my id...actually plzzz explain me in simple English What is Vandalism???..okk i understand There are so many English similar words but they have different meanings....so plzz tell me when i use these words to update Madhuri's page how i can edit these words in a page so i can use them for a proper meaning...plzzz explain me in Simple English some other things which is not acceptable in Wikipidia....plzzz im requesting u....I do not try to use any wrong links or any wrong words but plzzz tell me which links are accepatable in wikipidia so i can give my contribution in a proper way....Thank u so much of u.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help request

{{Helpme}} Hi plzz i need ur help..i normally update madhuri's page..last time i added Critically Acclaim Actress then i find links...but then they said i did vandalism....but plzzz Which links are vandalism and which links are not vandalism..plzzz explain me about these two things in simple english with proper examples...Thank you so much...}} Lionstaken (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Lionstaken (talk) 18:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Lionstaken (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are not vandalism in themselves, you are not trying to harm the encyclopedia, but they become vandalism if you edit-war to keep putting them in if other editors revert them. You should discuss them on the talk page, and if there is not a WP:Consensus (that means agreement with other editors) to make the change, you should give up. The problem is that you want to put in more and more detail about everything she does, and other editors think that is too much, the article does not need an addition every time she goes out and has a paragraph in the newspaper. An encyclopedia is not a fan-site.

I have two suggestions: try editing Wikipedia in your native language - there is list at WP:List of Wikipedias. Perhaps the article on Madhuri Dixit in that one needs improvement. Or find a Madhuri Dixit fan site - there seem to be several - where people would be interested in every detail of her movements and activities.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

can anybody tell me how long i can't edit Wikipedia's article......its so long...i acn't wait......

According to your block log, here, you've been blocked indefinitely. So, until you can show us you understand that you understand the reasons behind the block and won't do the same thing, you will be unable to edit. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 03:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

okk..but can u tell me how i can show u that im understand about the reasons of block..What i have to do to show that thing that i understand the reasons and i will not do the same things???? can u tell me?????

To be unblocked, you must convince us that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for,
you won't cause damage or disruption, and
you will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bjelleklang - talk 11:27, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionstaken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

yes, I read all the unblock guidelines, I understand eveything i can use only the reliable sources to update any Madhuri's articles, i can understand its not a gossip account so plz I am confessing i did really something wrong in Madhuri's Articles......so this time im requesing plz help me and plz unblock my account as soon as possible

Decline reason:

I'm not entirely convinced that you see the problem as using bad references is only a part of this. You also violated policies on neutrality and the biographies of living persons as well as edit warring despite being warned and blocked, with absolutely no attempts to start a discussion or ask others for help (until you were blocked the last time). I'm declining this request, please read Wikipedia:Standard offer. If you can adhere to those conditions and request another unblock in around six months, someone might be willing to review and unblock (providing that you actually address the concerns related to the block). Bjelleklang - talk 09:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lionstaken (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

174.3.199.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lionstaken". The reason given for Lionstaken's block is: "Violations of the Biographies of living persons policy".

Blocking administrator: JohnCD (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Looks like the autoblock is working. Being blocked means being blocked, not trying to edit while not signed in. I'd say that the six months clear of misbehaviour starts afresh here. Peridon (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, you were trying to evade your block by editing logged out, were you? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dispute resolution process hi..I want to know that how long I have to wait for unblock my account??? I still can't edit any page....the said I was blocked reason of "Violations of the Biographies of Living Persons Policy"...but how long my account will be blocked...plzz unblock my account....... <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a>
This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</a>.