User talk:Lionleebh

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Convent Datuk Keramat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Convent Datuk Keramat was changed by Lionleebh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922218 on 2017-04-08T18:55:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rev. Mother Tarcisius (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yashovardhan Dhanania was:

I am not sure about the tone of this article. You see the word 'very' being added to her name every time (and absent in the title) creates a strange effect. Has she been given the title of 'very Rev. Mother'. (I personally don't know how this works so sorry if I am wrong somewhere). Moving ahead, the rest of the article is pretty much in a direct tone like "In 19xx, she moved to ABC". While, I won't reject a submission over that, it creates a really strange kind of a feel reading through it. I also seriously note that the notability has not been properly established.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yashovardhan (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lionleebh, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yashovardhan (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of interest

Hello, Lionleebh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Convent Datuk Keramat, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius. Thanks! Eddie891 (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rev. Mother Tarcisius (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 08:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rev. Mother Tarcisius

Hello, Lionleebh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rev. Mother Tarcisius".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]