User talk:LinkSlip

Speedy deletion nomination of WeddingForward

Hello LinkSlip,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged WeddingForward for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Speedy deletion nomination of WeddingForward

Hello Administrator,

I would like to understand better why the page was deleted. You flagged it due to lack of "Credible claim of significance" however according to Wikipedia rules "A claim of significance need not be supported by any cited sources, much less by inline citations to reliable sources." I'd like to challenge your reasons for deletion since WeddingForward is a real company operating from Toronto, Canada.

If you would be so kind to provide your objections to the content I would be happy to clarify any point on the page.

The content of the page was modeled based on : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WeddingWire

Sincerely,

LinkSlip (talk) 03:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It still must make a credible claim of notability: none was made, and the fact that it's only a month old indicates that there's a long way to go. In the long run, you must provide third-party references for the article to survive a formal deletion debate. Since there was no credible indication of notability, it was speedily deleted. Acroterion (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]