User talk:Lingzhi.Random

Standard message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Barkeep49 (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Content creators' barnstar

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		In appreciation of your content work. Keep in touch! ——Serial 15:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Music for you

September

Every once in a while, I have a TFA, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

James Longstreet FAC

Hello. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/James Longstreet/archive1 is in need of additional reviewers. It requires a source review and would benefit from at least one additional general review. If you are interested, please feel free to leave a review of the article. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 00:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

• @Display name 99: I have good news and bad news. The good news is, if you'll supply me with sources, I'll do a source review. The bad news is that I am really not ready to start Support or Oppose !voting yet. ♦ Lingzhi.Random (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

OK. Sources are of course at the bottom of the article. There are links to all of them on Google books, although Google books does not have each work available in its entirety. I cannot provide you with links to the complete sources online, if that is what you are asking. Is that needed to conduct a source review? Some of them are available for a one hour period on archive.org if you have an account there. The main source that I used is a 1993 biography by Jeffry D. Wert, which is probably the best and most widely used biography of Longstreet. To a lesser degree, I used some older biographies of him. These are also reliable and academic in nature. Books written about specific campaigns and battles are often cited. For primary sources, Longstreet's memoirs are a great source of information, although I used this source with caution because it is heavily colored with bias. Edward Porter Alexander's Fighting for the Confederacy is an extremely balanced and valuable work which is cited frequently throughout the text.

Is there any other information that you require at the moment? Display name 99 (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

If you used any journal articles or have other files you've used, email them to me. ♦ Lingzhi.Random (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

I don't use email for Wikipedia. I can provide you with links here. I only used one journal article, which is citation 268 in the article. Citation 181 is a link to the Official Records of the War of the Rebellion, pages 498 and 529. [1] Literally everything else is either a book or an article on the Internet. Thank you. Display name 99 (talk) 01:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

J. Mukherjee 2015

Hello, Lingzhi.Random. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Worldbruce (talk) 16:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

@Worldbruce: Thanks for your help! It's awesome… Now it's time for me to sleep... ♦ Lingzhi.Random (talk) 17:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

		Season's Greetings
		Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Holidays

	Nollaig shona duit
	To Lingzhi, wising you and yours the very best for the holiday season and new year. Ceoil (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2021. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Another year gone

		Best wishes for the holidays
		Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021[2] & fecking 2022! Ceoil (talk) 04:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations from the Military History Project

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

reviewsourcecheck problems

Hi. Could you take a look at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T348906? It appears there's some problematic interaction between reviewsourcecheck-sb.js and the Who Wrote That extension. RoySmith (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Red Cliffs to FAR

I have nominated Battle of Red Cliffs for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 15:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Taiwanese indigenous peoples at FAR

I have nominated Taiwanese indigenous peoples for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)