User talk:Line which 1200

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Line which 1200

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Line which 1200 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

No contest button whatsoever Line which 1200 (talk) 19:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Line which 1200. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Please see comment to the persob who broke freesom of expression. Line which 1200 (talk) 03:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Unfair Commercial Practices Directive 2005, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I thought you guys did not like sources. I was going to add source, stop being on my back. And again it is a fundamental right not to disclose source. When do I gst to tell you and others to also up their games? Because whay I see not being ammended is bad Line which 1200 (talk) 08:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia breaks freedom of expression

The systematic way wikipedia abuses basic human right is an issue. Especially to prevent and delete pages about people who are known but have also been pinned down by chosen means, for breaking a law. Wikipedia also prevents our young people and vulnerables to find ways to be educated and protect themselves against Lissie Mackintosh and alike. Wikipedia seems against EU's legislation, as well as UK's ans pretty much a real page of public interest on consumer protection. You have 10 days to put page back. Line which 1200 (talk) 03:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

We have strict rules about what is allowed in biographies of living persons. Particularly, you must find reliable sources that state things, rather than coming to the conclusions yourself. Look at WP:SYNTH and WP:BLP for more information. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

you do not have strict rules, stop compartmenting, the Lissie Mackintosh content is bad. Articles about her are bad, so dont tell me you habe strict rules. It is at best bullying. Line which 1200 (talk) 08:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Appeal Against Block and Fastily

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Line which 1200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This Fastily defames and abuse journalism human rights, Lissie Mackintosh cannot be one sided. Not only does my information is protected but also by allowing sources likes Skysports article which is still media, it favours a positve commercial narrative about someone who 1. abused fair commercial practices 2. goes against my sources from law makers and rulers such as EU, CPR, ASA which educates as to how to recognize an illegal ad just as obviously as recognizing someone jumping a red light. Factually Ms Mackintosh did break the law and was caught by ASA on August, 8th 2023. Only to either smokescreen people with good labeling one end, but to routinely break the law again the other with likes of Mobil1. What Fastly does is showing Wikipedia promotes crime, period Line which 1200 (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What Fastily is doing is upholding Wikipedia's sourcing requirements for biographies of living people. If you wish to exercise your journalism rights you need to go find some other platform. Wikipedia is NOT the platform for that. Cabayi (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply: Again as per InfoCuria Case-Law Buivids Vs Datu you are in no position to 1.

judge 2. judge with mediocre knowledge of basic journali human right that yes an otherwise popular internet influencer reaching millions of likes can also have in people's mind the idea of some level of success can also hold a level of illegality as an idea, opinion to shape by the public debate and interest and information as per term 9 of 95/46 and considering directive 2005 29 ec that influencers and the following is based on trust and based on an unknown for some, Lissie Mackintosh not only broke that trust by creating hidden ads for the sole benefit of her gaining fuel but also was caught for it by ASA. You blocking me and empeding the work of journalism and freedom of expression to keep yout narrative exposing again Law sources against dubious links from skysports is criminal it feels and questions if you are unbiased. 10 days you have to recover the article and place it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Line which 1200 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 

10 days, or else what? Cabayi (talk) 12:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Read my response above, you and your mate say there are places to be a journalist. Just read. Line which 1200 (talk) 13:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Also I cannot report Fastily and neither you, do you think this is a fair trial with the pseudo infringment you report? So according to you Lissie Mackintosh is only about Marcus Armstrong, some interviews and her F1 employment. Let me remind you about this since you seem to call yourself expert enough to judge others in this pseudo court, that: "128. Finally, it is well-established that the gathering of information is an

essential preparatory step in journalism and an inherent, protected part of

press freedom (see, most recently, Magyar Helsinki Bizottság, cited above,

§ 130, with further references". So you not knowing about Mackintosh having been pinned down by ASA is one thing, but since the illegality of labeling is as obvious as jumping a red light if you had done your research rather than hanging out on Sky group, you would have welcomed by undiclose-sourced information about Mackintosh. What you are doing is vandalism

and nlt telling the truth in the public debate about consumer protection including in F1 and about Employment since she was employed at F1 Track TV with her breaking the law which is never a proof of qualification as per Marshall Vs Land. Line which 1200 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

0 reply, as expected... You didn't find your response in Skysports perhaps? Line which 1200 (talk) 09:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

While your account is blocked you retain access to your user talk page in order to lodge an appeal. If you continue to use your user talk page for other purposes your access will be revoked. Cabayi (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

This is rather threatening. Big guy. Line which 1200 (talk) 09:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)